AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Digitipes coonoorensis

Digitipes coonoorensis

Jangi & Dass, 1984

GBIF:119563400

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(5)

Description. Length to 64 mm. 17 antennal articles, 18 on one side in one individual in which abnormally short distal articles suggest damage; basal three articles glabrous dorsally (Fig. 13), 2.3 – 2.5 articles glabrous ventrally. Cephalic plate and tergites finely punctate. Longitudinal median furrow 15 – 20 % length of cephalic plate. Colour variable: cephalic plate, basal (glabrous) part of antennae and T 1 often blue; trunk may display gradual increase in brown pigment posteriorly, sometimes reverting to blue in posterior tergites; exceptionally cephalic plate and tergites all brown, or most of head and T 1 brown with mostly blue tergites from T 2; legs pale blue-brown. Forcipular coxosternal tooth plate wider than long (Figs 14, 15), with four main teeth, the inner two usually grouped, the outer tooth smaller than the inner three (Fig. 15); bases of tooth plates defined by oblique sutures diverging at a relatively obtuse angle of 140 – 150 °. Trochanteroprefemoral process with two distinct teeth along inner margin. Second maxillary claw with slender, needle-like accessory spurs. Article 2 of telopodite bearing a long, slender, pigmented spine distally. Tergites with paramedian sutures complete from TT 6 to 8. Tergites marginate from 7, 8 or 9. Tergites smooth (Fig. 22), longitudinal median ridge mostly absent, faint from T 9 in CES 08960. Sternites usually with short paramedian sutures, ca 10 % length of sternites in mid body region, at most about 25 % length of sternites, sometimes with a short extent on posterior part of sternite. Spiracle of segment 3 with narrow elliptical outline (Fig. 23), long axis oblique to horizontal plane; spiracles from segment 5 with rounded outline, irregular inner margin of peritrema, long axis of spiracular opening vertical. All spiracles with regularly scalloped inner margin of peritrema, folding into a smooth band of trichomes beneath which atrium has strongly humped wall and floor. First three (four in one individual) pairs of legs with two tarsal spurs, the subsequent up to 19 with one. Leg 20 without tarsal spur, except one individual. A tibial and a femoral spur on leg 1 only. Tergite of ultimate leg-bearing segment with gently convex lateral margins that weakly converge posteriorly; posterior margin gently sinuous, bluntly pointed to rounded posteromedially (Fig. 17). Sternite of ultimate legbearing segment with sides converging posteriorly, nearly straight, posterior margin moderately concave (Fig. 18). Coxopleural process moderately long, robustly conical, set off from course of posterolateral margin of coxopleuron by a pronounced inflection, its apex variably with a slight to distinct lateral orientation (Fig. 18); two apical spines, one lateral spine (absent on one side in two individuals). Coxopleural pores relatively dense, approximately bimodal size distribution; pore field relatively narrow, terminating moderately to strongly beneath dorsal margin of coxopleuron (Fig. 16); non-porose area on coxopleural process at least 60 % length to posterior margin of sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment, sometimes nearly reaching that margin (Fig. 18). Ultimate leg prefemur with width at distal end about 30 % its length. Prefemoral spines moderately large (Fig. 19): VL 3 (small fourth spine rarely present), VM 2 (one specimen with 3 on one side), DM 0 or 1. Distomedial process in males bluntly conical, extending about as far as the distal end of the femur on its dorsal side (Fig. 20); groove on medial surface of femur extending about half length of femur (Fig. 21). Ultimate leg tarsus 1 1.6 – 2.5 times length of tarsus 2; tarsus 1 2.2 – 5 times longer than pretarsus; pretarsus with pair of short accessory claws.
Joshi, Jahnavi, Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2013): Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity. Zootaxa 3626 (1): 99-145, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5
Digitipes putative species 1. Joshi and Karanth, 2012: figs 2, 3, 5.
Joshi, Jahnavi, Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2013): Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity. Zootaxa 3626 (1): 99-145, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5
Diagnosis. Digitipes with basal three antennal articles glabrous dorsally. Tergite paramedian sutures complete from TT 6 to 8; tergites fully marginate starting from 7 to 9; tergites smooth, longitudinal median ridge rarely present. Coxopleural process relatively long, stout, variably inflected outward in ventral view, lateral spine present; pore field terminating far beneath dorsal margin of coxopleuron; leg 20 without tarsal spur.
Joshi, Jahnavi, Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2013): Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity. Zootaxa 3626 (1): 99-145, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5
Discussion. Absence of a leg 20 tarsal spur was used by Jangi and Dass (1984: 41) in the first couplet of their key to Indian species of Digitipes, allowing D. coonoorensis (spur absent) to be distinguished from D. barnabasi and D. indicus (spur present). We observe this character to remain reliable for separation of D. coonoorensis apart from one individual resolved within the species phylogenetically that possesses a spur. A record of D. coonoorensis was made by Yadav (1993 b: 324) from Sindhudurg, Maharashtra, more northerly than any material of the species examined by us. We have not seen the material and have not included the record in the synonymy. All the individuals examined here were found in the shola forests or grasslands of high elevation areas of the southern Western Ghats. Light-microscopic description of the spiracles is included for this species. For comparative purposes, the spiracle on segment 3 is depicted for other species of the genus as well (Figs 40, 45, 56, 67), but we have not identified obvious taxonomic variation.
Joshi, Jahnavi, Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2013): Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity. Zootaxa 3626 (1): 99-145, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5
Material examined. 11 specimens of Digitipes putative species 1 (D. coonoorensis of Joshi and Karanth, 2012), including CES 07125, CES 07132 and CES 07134 from close to type locality; CES registration numbers in Joshi and Karanth (2012: fig. 2, Table S 1). These individuals were collected largely in high elevation forests (<1800 msl) of the southern and central parts of the Western Ghats, India (distribution map in Joshi and Karanth 2012: fig. 5 c); all leg. J. Joshi, 2007 – 2010.
Joshi, Jahnavi, Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2013): Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity. Zootaxa 3626 (1): 99-145, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(5)

FIGURES 13 – 18. Digitipes coonoorensis Jangi and Dass, 1984. CES 08960 (female) except Fig. 15, CES 07125 (female) and Fig. 16, CES 091088 (male). 13. Cephalic plate and T 1, dorsal view, scale = 1 mm. 14. Forcipular segment, ventral view, scale = 1 mm. 15. Tooth plates, ventral view, scale = 1 mm. 16. Coxopleuron, lateral view, scale = 1 mm. 17. Tergite of ultimate legbearing segment, dorsal view, scale = 0.5 mm. 18. Coxopleuron and sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment, ventral view, scale = 0.5 mm.

Imageimage/png© Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.

FIGURES 19 – 23. Digitipes coonoorensis Jangi and Dass, 1984. 19. Ultimate leg prefemur, ventral view, CES 08960 (female), scale = 0.5 mm. 20. Ultimate leg femur, dorsal view, CES 091088 (male), scale = 0.5 mm. 21. Ultimate leg femur, medial view, CES 091088, scale = 0.5 mm. 22. TT 18 – 20, dorsal view, CES 08960, scale = 1 mm. 23. Spiracle on segment 3, CES 07125, scale = 0.25 mm.

Imageimage/png© Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.

FIGURES 36 – 45. Digitipes jonesii (Verhoeff, 1938). 36 – 40, CES 091062 (male); 41 – 45, CES 091090 (male). 36. Ultimate leg prefemur, ventral view, scale = 1 mm. 37. Ultimate leg femur, dorsal view, scale = 1 mm. 38. Ultimate leg femur, medial view, scale = 1 mm. 39. TT 18 – 19, dorsal view, scale = 1 mm. 40. Spiracle on segment 3, lateral view, scale = 0.5 mm. 41. Ultimate leg prefemur, ventral view, scale = 0.5 mm. 42. Ultimate leg femur, medial view, scale = 0.5 mm. 43. Ultimate leg femur, ventral view, scale = 1 mm. 44. TT 18 – 20, dorsal view, scale = 1 mm. 45. Spiracle on segment 3, lateral view, scale = 0.25 mm.

Imageimage/png© Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.

FIGURES 52 – 56. Digitipes jangii n. sp. CES 08912 (holotype male) except Fig. 56, CES 08915 (paratype male). 52. Ultimate leg prefemur, ventral view, scale = 0.5 mm. 53. Ultimate leg femur, dorsal view, scale = 0.5 mm. 54. Ultimate leg femur, medial view, scale = 0.5 mm. 55. TT 18 – 20, dorsal view, scale = 0.5 mm. 56. Spiracle on segment 3, scale = 0.25 mm.

Imageimage/png© Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.

FIGURES 63 – 67. Digitipes periyarensis n. sp. Holotype CES 091037 (female) except Fig. 63, CES 091038 (female). 63. Ultimate leg prefemur, ventral view, scale = 0.5 mm. 64. Ultimate leg, dorsal view, scale = 1 mm. 65. Ultimate leg femur and tibia, dorsal view, scale = 0.5 mm. 66. TT 18 – 20, dorsal view, scale = 1 mm. 67. Spiracle on segment 3, lateral view, scale = 0.25 mm.

Imageimage/png© Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.Joshi, Jahnavi;Edgecombe, Gregory D.

IMAGES

Gallery(5)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Joshi, Jahnavi, Edgecombe, Gregory D. (2013): Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity. Zootaxa 3626 (1): 99-145, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5

Abstract

Recent work on molecular phylogenetics of Scolopendridae from the Western Ghats, Peninsular India, has suggested the presence of six cryptic species of the otostigmine Digitipes Attems, 1930, together with three species described in previous taxonomic work by Jangi and Dass (1984). Digitipes is the correct generic attribution for a monophyletic group of Indian species, these being united with three species from tropical Africa (including the type) that share a distomedial process on the ultimate leg femur of males that is otherwise unknown in Otostigminae. Second maxillary characters previously used in the diagnosis of Digitipes are dismissed because Indian species do not possess the putatively diagnostic character states. Two new species from the Western Ghats that correspond to groupings identified based on monophyly, sequence divergence and coalescent analysis using molecular data are diagnosed based on distinct morphological characters. They are D. jangii and D. periyarensis n. spp. Three species named by Jangi and Dass (Digitipes barnabasi, D. coonoorensis and D. indicus) are revised based on new collections; D. indicus is a junior subjective synonym of Arthrorhabdus jonesii Verhoeff, 1938, the combination becoming Digitipes jonesii (Verhoeff, 1938) n. comb. The presence of Arthrorhabdus in India is accordingly refuted. Three putative species delimited by molecular and ecological data remain cryptic from the perspective of diagnostic morphological characters and are presently retained in D. barnabasi, D. jangii and D. jonesii. A molecularly-delimited species that resolved as sister group to a well-supported clade of Indian Digitipes is identified as Otostigmus ruficeps Pocock, 1890, originally described from a single specimen and revised herein. One Indian species originally assigned to Digitipes, D. gravelyi, deviates from confidently-assigned Digitipes with respect to several characters and is reassigned to Otostigmus, as O. gravelyi (Jangi and Dass, 1984) n. comb.

Key words: Scolopendridae, Otostigmini, Otostigmus, Western Ghats, cryptic species

Joshi J, Edgecombe G D, plazi (2013). Revision of the scolopendrid centipede Digitipes Attems, 1930, from India (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha): reconciling molecular and morphological estimates of species diversity. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3626.1.5 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-14.

CC0Published 12/31/2013View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
119563400
Dataset Key
135b7553-b75c-4020-b1a6-c689a05b7e66
Origin
source
Backbone Key
2232198
Taxon ID
4F7A87F2FFD7FFB1FF0BF9C0FDB2FB14.taxon
Last Crawled
6/11/2026
Last Interpreted
6/11/2026