AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Ceriodaphnia megops

Ceriodaphnia megops

Sars, 1862

GBIF:154507994

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(1)

(Figs. 1 – 2) Length about 0.5 – 0.55 mm, width about 0.7 of length. In lateral view, ephippium almost semicircular, somewhat asymmetrical, stronger narrowing posteriorly; dorsal margin almost straight; ventral margin regularly curved from postero-ventral to antero-ventral angle (Figs. 1 A, 2 A – D). Paired latero-dorsal ridges strongly expressed (Figs. 1 B – D), extend above dorsal margin as seen laterally (Figs. 1 A, 2 A – D), their dorsal margin slightly and regularly convex. A distinct depression along dorsum separating two halves of ephippium and, respectively, two halves of dorsal plate; sculpture of dorsal plate consisting of a series of longitudinal wrinkles (Figs. 1 D – E). Sculpture on latero-dorsal ridges low, consisting of small semicircular projections (Figs. 1 D – F); the external signs of roundedhexagonal air-spaces well-visible under light microscope (Fig. 2 E). Egg locule smooth, only somewhat extending laterally, with poorly expressed vertical wrinkles (Fig. 1 B, F – G); under optical microscope, surface of locule relatively smooth, with small irregularities (Fig. 2 E). Rest of ephippium surface covered by low, dense, flattened domes (Figs. 1 G – H); the external signs of air-spaces well-visible under light microscope (Figs. 2 D, F). Such air spaces absent in the locule region. Ventral rim of ephippium lacking air spaces, with obscure polygonal reticulation (Figs. 1 H, 2 F).
Kotov, Alexey A., Ibragimova, Aisylu G., Neretina, Anna N. (2018): Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Zootaxa 4527 (1): 105-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(2)

FIGURE 1. Ceriodaphnia megops Sars, 1862, ephippial female from Lake Glubokoe, Moscow Area. A, lateral view of female. B, latero-dorsal view of ephippium. C, dorsal view. D, fragment of ephippium dorsal portion, dorsal view. E, dorso-lateral keel, dorsal view. F, its lateral view. G–H, ventral portion of ephippium. Scale bars: 0.1 mm for A–D, H; 0.01 mm for E–G.

Imageimage/png© Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.

FIGURE 2. Ceriodaphnia megops Sars, 1862, ephippial female from Lake Glubokoe, Moscow Area. A–B, ephippial female with a single egg in ephippium, lateral view. C–D, opened ephippium, egg removed. E–F, its central and ventral portion. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Imageimage/png© Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.

IMAGES

Gallery(2)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Kotov, Alexey A., Ibragimova, Aisylu G., Neretina, Anna N. (2018): Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Zootaxa 4527 (1): 105-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9

Abstract

Over the last decades significant progress was achieved in the investigations of water fleas (Crustacea: Cladocera). Their morphology, taxonomy and biogeography can be considered as well-studied, but still there are genera almost ignored by taxonomists. The genus Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Cladocera: Daphniidae) belongs to such problematic groups. From previous publications, it is obvious that different taxa from the genus have a very different morphology of their ephippia. Here, we study ephippium morphology in six common taxa from central-northern European Russia (Ceriodaphnia megops Sars, 1862; C. laticaudata P.E. Müller, 1867; C. rotunda (Straus, 1820) sensu Sars, 1862; C. quadrangula (O.F. Müller, 1785); C. pulchella Sars, 1862; C. reticulata (Jurine, 1820)) using light and scanning electron microscopy. A key to their identification based on ephippium morphology is proposed. This could be the starting point for revisions based on morphological characters with special emphasis on ephippia. Also, we propose that Ceriodaphnia taxa at least from the Holocene subfossil samples could be identified to the species group level according to structure of their ephippia. This approach to identification of Ceriodaphnia remains in sediments could improve palaeoecological reconstructions. However a global revision of the genus is still needed.

Kotov A A, Ibragimova A G, Neretina A N, plazi (2018). Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-14.

CC0Published 12/4/2018View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
154507994
Dataset Key
021796c0-cde1-4dfd-a83a-3b1c83ce466b
Origin
source
Backbone Key
2234862
Taxon ID
38745B7FFFABFF9CFF4ECAFBFEDEC52C.taxon
Last Crawled
6/10/2026
Last Interpreted
6/10/2026