AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Ceriodaphnia pulchella

Ceriodaphnia pulchella

Sars, 1862

GBIF:154507995

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(1)

(Figs. 9 – 10) Length about 0.35 mm, width about 0.7 of length. In lateral view, ephippium semicircular; dorsal margin straight; ventral margin regularly curved from postero-ventral to antero-ventral angle (Figs. 9 A, 10 A – C). Paired latero-dorsal ridges absent (Figs. 9 B – C). A depression along dorsum separates two halves of ephippium well-visible; sculpture of dorsal plate without any wrinkles, with numerous low spots covered by minute tubercles (Fig. 9 D). Egg locule very slightly extends laterally, without any wrinkles, in general smooth (Fig. 9 C), but bearing minute tubercles sometimes organized into spots (Fig. 9 E), probably these spots make locule surface non-transparent under light microscope (Figs. 10 D – D). Space between egg locule and dorsal margin with same sculpture. The rest of ephippium with obscure (under SEM) polygonal reticulation (Fig. 9 F) – external sign of air-spaces which are well-visible under light microscope (Figs. 10 D – F); lines of reticulation with especially minute tubercles. Ephippium has a very narrow ventral rim with obscure reticulation, lacking any tubercles (Figs. 9 F, 10 F). Note that in our material the ephippia were unusually small as compared to previous descriptions (Jaksch 1992).
Kotov, Alexey A., Ibragimova, Aisylu G., Neretina, Anna N. (2018): Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Zootaxa 4527 (1): 105-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(2)

FIGURE 9. Ceriodaphnia pulchella Sars, 1862, ephippial female from a pond in stadium of AZLK factory near Metro Station "Textilshchiky", Moscow city. A, lateral view of female. B, dorsal view of ephippium. C, antero-lateral view. D, fragment of ephippium dorsal portion, lateral view. E, sculpture of its central portion. F, postero-ventral portion of ephippium. Scale bars: 0.1 mm for A–C; 0.01 mm for D–F.

Imageimage/png© Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.

FIGURE 10. Ceriodaphnia pulchella Sars, 1862, ephippial female from a pond in stadium of AZLK factory near Metro Station "Textilshchiky", Moscow city. A–B, ephippial female with a single egg in ephippium, lateral view. C–D, opened ephippium. E–F, its dorsal and ventral portion. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Imageimage/png© Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.

IMAGES

Gallery(2)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Kotov, Alexey A., Ibragimova, Aisylu G., Neretina, Anna N. (2018): Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Zootaxa 4527 (1): 105-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9

Abstract

Over the last decades significant progress was achieved in the investigations of water fleas (Crustacea: Cladocera). Their morphology, taxonomy and biogeography can be considered as well-studied, but still there are genera almost ignored by taxonomists. The genus Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Cladocera: Daphniidae) belongs to such problematic groups. From previous publications, it is obvious that different taxa from the genus have a very different morphology of their ephippia. Here, we study ephippium morphology in six common taxa from central-northern European Russia (Ceriodaphnia megops Sars, 1862; C. laticaudata P.E. Müller, 1867; C. rotunda (Straus, 1820) sensu Sars, 1862; C. quadrangula (O.F. Müller, 1785); C. pulchella Sars, 1862; C. reticulata (Jurine, 1820)) using light and scanning electron microscopy. A key to their identification based on ephippium morphology is proposed. This could be the starting point for revisions based on morphological characters with special emphasis on ephippia. Also, we propose that Ceriodaphnia taxa at least from the Holocene subfossil samples could be identified to the species group level according to structure of their ephippia. This approach to identification of Ceriodaphnia remains in sediments could improve palaeoecological reconstructions. However a global revision of the genus is still needed.

Kotov A A, Ibragimova A G, Neretina A N, plazi (2018). Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-15.

CC0Published 12/4/2018View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
154507995
Dataset Key
021796c0-cde1-4dfd-a83a-3b1c83ce466b
Origin
source
Backbone Key
2234865
Taxon ID
38745B7FFFA0FF90FF4ECE64FF3CC2DB.taxon
Last Crawled
6/10/2026
Last Interpreted
6/10/2026