AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Ceriodaphnia quadrangula

Ceriodaphnia quadrangula

(O.F.Muller, 1785)

GBIF:154507996

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(1)

(Figs. 7 – 8) Length about 0.35 – 0.4 mm, width about 0.6 – 0.65 of length. In lateral view, ephippium semicircular; dorsal margin slightly convex to almost straight; ventral margin regularly curved from postero-ventral to antero-ventral angle (Figs. 7 A – B, 8 A – D). Paired latero-dorsal ridges absent (Figs. 7 S – C). A distinct depression along dorsum separates two halves of ephippium and, respectively, two halves of dorsal plate with sculpture of relatively thick small columns with branched tips (Figs. 7 D – E); no any wrinkles or low projections are detected, no air spaces in this region. Egg locule somewhat extends laterally (Fig. 7 B); surface of locule with columns bearing branched tips as in the region of dorsal plate (Figs. 7 E – F). The rest of ephippium surface covered by same columns, but towards the margins they diminishing in size, and finally they are transformed into circles of small tubercles (Fig. 7 H). Airspaces expressed in ventral portion of ephippium well-visible under light microscope (Figs. 8 C – F), but no their signs visible under SEM, excluding most ventral portion, where they are slightly elevated above the general surface, just each air space bears the circle of small tubercles described above (Fig. 7 H). Ventral rim of ephippium lacking air spaces, without reticulation (Figs. 7 H, 8 F).
Kotov, Alexey A., Ibragimova, Aisylu G., Neretina, Anna N. (2018): Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Zootaxa 4527 (1): 105-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(2)

FIGURE 7. Ceriodaphnia quadrangula (O.F. Müller, 1785), ephippial female from Lake Dubrovskoje, Darvin Reserve, Vologda Area. A, lateral view of female. B, latero-dorsal view of ephippium. C, dorsal view. D, fragment of ephippium dorsal portion, dorsal view. E, its armature. F–G, its sculpture of its central portion. H, postero-ventral portion of ephippium. Scale bars: 0.1 mm for A–C; 0.01 mm for D–H.

Imageimage/png© Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.

FIGURE 8. Ceriodaphnia quadrangula (O.F. Müller, 1785), ephippial female from peat quarries near Vasyutino village, Moscow Area. A–B, ephippial female with a single egg in ephippium, lateral view. C, separated ephippium. D–F, opened ephippium, egg removed, dorsal and ventral portion. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.

Imageimage/png© Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.Kotov, Alexey A.;Ibragimova, Aisylu G.;Neretina, Anna N.

IMAGES

Gallery(2)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Kotov, Alexey A., Ibragimova, Aisylu G., Neretina, Anna N. (2018): Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Zootaxa 4527 (1): 105-123, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9

Abstract

Over the last decades significant progress was achieved in the investigations of water fleas (Crustacea: Cladocera). Their morphology, taxonomy and biogeography can be considered as well-studied, but still there are genera almost ignored by taxonomists. The genus Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Cladocera: Daphniidae) belongs to such problematic groups. From previous publications, it is obvious that different taxa from the genus have a very different morphology of their ephippia. Here, we study ephippium morphology in six common taxa from central-northern European Russia (Ceriodaphnia megops Sars, 1862; C. laticaudata P.E. Müller, 1867; C. rotunda (Straus, 1820) sensu Sars, 1862; C. quadrangula (O.F. Müller, 1785); C. pulchella Sars, 1862; C. reticulata (Jurine, 1820)) using light and scanning electron microscopy. A key to their identification based on ephippium morphology is proposed. This could be the starting point for revisions based on morphological characters with special emphasis on ephippia. Also, we propose that Ceriodaphnia taxa at least from the Holocene subfossil samples could be identified to the species group level according to structure of their ephippia. This approach to identification of Ceriodaphnia remains in sediments could improve palaeoecological reconstructions. However a global revision of the genus is still needed.

Kotov A A, Ibragimova A G, Neretina A N, plazi (2018). Identification of Ceriodaphnia Dana, 1853 (Crustacea: Cladocera) taxa from European Russia based on ephippial morphology. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4527.1.9 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-14.

CC0Published 12/4/2018View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
154507996
Dataset Key
021796c0-cde1-4dfd-a83a-3b1c83ce466b
Origin
source
Backbone Key
2234859
Taxon ID
38745B7FFFA2FF95FF4ECCEDFD16C4C7.taxon
Last Crawled
6/10/2026
Last Interpreted
6/10/2026