AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Lepidodactylus mitchelli

Lepidodactylus mitchelli

Kraus, 2019

GBIF:159043708

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(1)

Fig. 3 A, D, 4 A urn: lsid: zoobank. org: act: AFFBA 315 - F 8 AA- 45 D 0 - 933 A-EEC 2 F 5 BA 02 CC Holotype. UMMZ 244058 (field tag FK 17164), mature male, collected by F. Kraus and W. Nemani, Boiaboiawaga Island, 10.2096 ° S, 150.9059 ° E, sea level, Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea, 20 March 2015. Paratypes (n = 7). Same locality as holotype, collected by F. Kraus and D. Mitchell, 25 May 2002 (BPBM 15841 – 47). Diagnosis. A medium-sized (adult SVL 35 – 45.5 mm) species of Lepidodactylus having a subcylindrical tail without a lateral fringe of enlarged scales; 12 – 14 enlarged scales of pore-bearing series limited to precloacal region, 10 – 13 precloacal pores in males; 13 – 17 T 4 lamellae, 8 – 11 T 1 lamellae, with 2 – 3 divided subterminal scansors on T 4; lamellae occupying most of toes (T 4 lamellaeL / T 4 L = 0.84 – 0.98); fairly wide toes (T 4 W / T 4 L = 0.31 – 0.40) with moderate webbing (T 3 T 4 webL / T 4 L = 0.13 – 0.23); row of tiny scales between the precloacal series and either side of the pubic patch; dorsum usually with several irregular dark-brown saddles (wide tan vertebral band in one juvenile); and many posteroventral and plantar scales uniformly brown. Comparisons with other species. The subcylindrical tail without a lateral fringe of enlarged scales and the 2 – 3 divided subterminal scansors under the toes place Lepidodactylus mitchelli sp. nov. in Brown and Parker’s (1977) Group II. Lepidodactylus mitchelli sp. nov. differs from other Melanesian members of this group as follows: from L. guppyi, L. pulcher, and L. shebae in having fewer enlarged precloacal / femoral scales (12 – 14 versus 39 – 52, 18 – 20, and 34, respectively) and fewer precloacal pores (10 – 13 versus 39 – 52, 16, and 32, respectively); it further differs from L. pulcher in its smaller adult size (SVL = 35 – 45.5 mm versus 40 – 55 mm in L. pulcher). The new species is most similar to L. novaeguineae. It differs from that species in having more T 4 lamellae (13 – 17 versus 9 – 15 in L. novaeguineae), its color pattern of vague dark-brown saddles (Fig. 4 A, versus many longitudinal dark streaks or dorsolateral series of bold dark-brown blotches in L. novaeguineae), generally darker venter (heavily peppered with brown in seven of eight specimens versus white with sparse brown punctations in L. novaeguineae, Fig. 3 A versus 3 C), and in having many posteroventral and plantar scales uniformly brown (versus only with minute black punctations in L. novaeguineae, Fig. 3 D versus 3 F). Description of holotype. A mature male of medium size (SVL = 40.5 mm, TrL = 19.5 mm). Head relatively long (HL / SVL = 0.24) and wide (HW / HL = 0.88), distinct from neck. Loreal region slightly inflated; no distinct canthus rostralis. Top of snout, area between nares, and area posterior to nares concave. Snout tapered and rounded at tip, relatively long (SN / HL = 0.44), almost twice eye diameter (SN / EY = 1.9). Eye relatively small (EY / HL = 0.23, EY / EN = 0.65); pupil vertical, constricted into series of four lobes; supraciliaries slightly larger than adjacent granules. Ear opening small (Ear / HL = 0.073), compressed, oriented diagonally from posterodorsal to anteroventral on right, horizontal on left; distance between ear and eye significantly larger than eye diameter (EE / EY = 1.6). Rostral wider (2.0 mm) than high (0.9 mm), highest just medial to nares, lower between these points; length (0.2 mm); barely visible from above. Supranasals separated by three internasals. Rostral in contact with first supralabials, two supranasals, and three internasals. External nares circular; each bordered by rostral, two supranasals, first supralabial, and one postnasal. Mental shallowly triangular, shorter (0.60 mm) than wide (0.75 mm). Mental bordered posteriorly by two enlarged postmentals, these bordered posteriorly by three rows of enlarged gulars that are followed by smaller granular chin scales. First three infralabials bordered below by somewhat enlarged postmentals; remaining scales below infralabials smaller, only twice size of central throat scales. Supralabials to mid-orbital position nine on each side; to angle of jaw 12 on each side. Infralabials 13 on each side. Body of modest habitus (TrL / SVL = 0.48), slightly depressed. Dorsal scales on head, body, limbs, and throat tiny, juxtaposed granules, larger on sides and snout; tubercles absent. Ventral scales flatter but somewhat beaded, smooth, subimbricate, gradually decreasing in size laterally to become granular. Enlarged precloacal scales in single series of 12 scales, each bearing a pore; scales on thighs not enlarged. Enlarged scales form a pubic patch between the precloacal series and vent; row of tiny scales between the precloacal series and either side of the pubic patch; eight scales in a row between apex of enlarged precloacal series and vent. Scales on palms and soles rounded, smooth. Fore- and hindlimbs relatively small but well-developed (FA / SVL = 0.11, CS / SVL = 0.13). Digits well-developed, broadly dilated throughout their length (T 4 W / T 4 L = 0.31, Fig. 3 D), all but first fingers and toes with recurved claws; clawed phalanges laterally compressed, free above and extending slightly beyond terminal scansors. Subdigital lamellae narrow and smooth, all digits with 2 – 3 divided subterminal scansors; lamellae extend for majority of length of each toe (T 4 scansor L / T 4 L = 0.89). Lamellae of manus 9 – 10 – 11 – 13 – 9 on right, 9 – 10 – 11 – 13 – 10 on left; of pes 8 – 11 – 16 – 16 – 11 on right, 10 – 10 – 14 – 15 – 8 on left. Relative lengths of digits on manus and pes I
Kraus, Fred (2019): New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands. Zootaxa 4651 (2): 305-329, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4651.2.7

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(4)

FIGURE 2. Map of New Guinea and surrounding islands showing type localities for Lepidodactylus aignanus sp. nov. (diamond), L. dialeukos sp. nov. (triangle), L. kwasnickae sp. nov. (square), L. mitchelli sp. nov. (circle), and L. zweifeli sp. nov. (star).

Imageimage/png© Kraus, FredKraus, Fred

FIGURE 3. Ventral views of (A) holotype of L. mitchelli sp. nov. (UMMZ 244058), (B) paratype of L. kwasnickae sp. nov. (BPBM 39884), and (C) paratype of L. novaeguineae (AMNH 100210) showing ventral pigmentation differences among these species; scale bars = 5 mm. Ventral views of (D) left foot of holotype of L. mitchelli sp. nov. (UMMZ 244058), (E) left foot of paratype of L. kwasnickae sp. nov. (BPBM 39884), and (F) right foot of paratype of L. novaeguineae (AMNH 100210) showing toe-width and pigmentation differences among these species; scale bars = 2 mm.

Imageimage/png© Kraus, FredKraus, Fred

FIGURE 4. Portraits of new Lepidodactylus species in life. (A) holotype of L. mitchelli sp. nov. (UMMZ 244058), (B) holo- type of L. kwasnickae sp. nov. (BPBM 39880), (C) paratype of L. kwasnickae sp. nov. (BPBM 39879), and (D) paratype of L. kwasnickae sp. nov. (BPBM 39151).

Imageimage/png© Kraus, FredKraus, Fred

FIGURE 5. (A) Boiaboiawaga Island, Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea, habitat of Lepidodactylus mitchelli sp. nov., photo by D. Mitchell; and (B) interior forest on Woodlark Island, Milne Bay Province, Papua New Guinea, habitat of L. kwas- nickae sp. nov., photo by D. Polhemus.

Imageimage/png© Kraus, FredKraus, Fred

IMAGES

Gallery(4)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Kraus, Fred (2019): New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands. Zootaxa 4651 (2): 305-329, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4651.2.7

Abstract

I describe five new species of Lepidodactylus from New Guinea or adjacent islands that are members of Brown & Parker’s (1977) phenetic Groups I and II and belong to the clades identified as the L. orientalis, L. pumilus, and L. novaeguineae groups of Oliver et al. (2018a). One of the new species is restricted to an isolated mountain range on New Guinea; the remainder inhabit offshore islands ranging from 3–250 km from New Guinea. These species are distinguished from their congeners primarily by unique combinations of toe lamellar numbers and shape, numbers and distribution of enlarged precloacal/femoral scales and pores, toe webbing, toe width, and color pattern. These clades are ancient, and the ancestor of one of them has been on the East Papuan Composite Terrane for at least 28 MY, highlighting the long-term importance of that former large island in generating regional biodiversity. At least one, and probably three, of the new species are inhabitants of forest interiors; one occupies disturbed coastal areas; and the habitat of the last is currently unsurmisable. All of the new species likely have restricted geographic distributions, with four of them being limited to one or a few small islands. As a result of their small ranges, rapid habitat conversion in the ranges of some of these species, and the threat of further habitat loss in the others, most of these species are of conservation concern although it is uncertain if any of them is under immediate threat.

Kraus F, plazi (2019). New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4651.2.7 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-15.

CC0Published 8/5/2019View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
159043708
Dataset Key
00ad1537-4dda-475f-8007-991dc1f0eac8
Origin
source
Backbone Key
10423359
Taxon ID
3E6D87E38056FFB5FF3E7737DE55FC5E.taxon
Last Crawled
6/10/2026
Last Interpreted
6/10/2026