AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Lepidodactylus zweifeli

Lepidodactylus zweifeli

Kraus, 2019

GBIF:159043709

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(1)

Fig. 1 B, D urn: lsid: zoobank. org: act: 7722 DE 9 A-EA 83 - 44 EF- 96 D 4 - C 010 B 041 DBA 8 Holotype. AMNH 105088 (field tag RZ 08430), mature male, collected by R. Zweifel at Wanuma, 4.90 ° S, 145.33 ° E, 2200 feet [= 670 m], Adelbert Mts., Madang Province, Papua New Guinea, 5 August 1969. Paratype. Same data as holotype (AMNH 105087). Diagnosis. A medium-sized (adult SVL 41 – 44.5 mm) species of Lepidodactylus having a subcylindrical tail without a lateral fringe of enlarged scales; all subterminal scansors entire; 40 enlarged precloacal / femoral scales in three series extending along entire femoral region, 38 precloacal / femoral pores in three series in the sole male, with the lateral series on each thigh separated by 2 – 3 scales from the precloacal series; 9 – 12 T 4 lamellae, 7 – 8 T 1 lamellae; fairly narrow toes (T 4 W / T 4 L = 0.24 – 27) with basal webbing (T 3 T 4 webL / T 4 L = 0.10 – 0.13, T 4 T 5 webL / T 4 L = 0.08 – 0.12); narrow snout (EN / IN = 1.72 – 1.79); and dorsum with dark-brown markings but no pale spots. Comparisons with other species. The subcylindrical tail without a lateral fringe of enlarged scales and the series of undivided scansors under all toes place Lepidodactylus zweifeli sp. nov. in Brown and Parker’s (1977) Group I. Lepidodactylus zweifeli sp. nov. differs from other Melanesian members of this group as follows: from L. browni, L. flaviocularis, L. mutahi, and L. orientalis in having the precloacal / femoral pore series arrayed into three series (versus a continuous row in the other species); from L. magnus in its much smaller size (SVL = 41 – 44.5 mm versus 50 – 70 mm in L. magnus), fewer lamellae on T 1 (7 – 8 versus 9 – 12 in L. magnus), and in having the precloacal / femoral pores arrayed in three series (versus usually in a single series in L. magnus, which may, however, have one or a few scales disrupting the series); and from L. pumilus in having the femoral and precloacal pore series separated by only 3 – 5 scales (versus 7 – 12 scales in L. pumilus), and less toe webbing (T 3 T 4 webL / T 4 L = 0.10 – 0.13 versus 0.18 – 0.19 in L. pumilus, Fig. 1 D), especially between T 4 and T 5 (T 4 T 5 webL / T 4 L = 0.08 – 0.12 versus 0.23 in L. pumilus). Lepidodactylus zweifeli sp. nov. differs from L. aignanus sp. nov. in its larger size (SVL 41 – 44.5 mm versus 37.5 mm in L. aignanus sp. nov.), in having enlarged femoral scales (absent in L. aignanus sp. nov.) such that the total number of enlarged precloacal / femoral scales is 40 (versus 17 in L. aignanus sp. nov.), narrower toes (T 4 W / T 4 L = 0.24 – 27 versus 0.33 in L. aignanus sp. nov., Fig. 1 C versus 1 D), less toe webbing (T 3 T 4 webL / T 4 L = 0.10 – 0.13 versus 0.26 in L. aignanus sp. nov., Fig. 1 C versus 1 D), narrower snout (EN / IN = 1.72 – 1.79 versus 1.61 in L. aignanus sp. nov.), and dorsum without pale spots (versus with lateral and dorsolateral rows of pale spots in L. aignanus sp. nov., Fig. 1 A versus 1 B). Description of holotype. A mature male of medium size (SVL = 41.0 mm, TrL = 21.0 mm). Head relatively long (HL / SVL = 0.23) and wide (HW / HL = 0.76), distinct from neck. Loreal region slightly inflated; no distinct canthus rostralis. Top of snout, area between nares, and area posterior to nares concave. Snout tapered and rounded at tip, relatively long (SN / HL = 0.43), longer than eye diameter (SN / EY = 1.5). Eye relatively large (EY / HL = 0.28, EY / EN = 0.84); pupil vertical, constricted into series of four lobes; supraciliaries slightly larger than adjacent granules. Ear opening small (Ear / HL = 0.065), compressed, oriented diagonally from posterodorsal to anteroventral; distance between ear and eye slightly larger than eye diameter (EE / EY = 1.1). Rostral wider (1.7 mm) than high (0.9 mm), highest just medial to nares, lower between these points; length 0.5 mm; dorsal portion with short groove on posterior 0.2 mm. Supranasals separated by three internasals. Rostral in contact with first supralabials, two supranasals, and three internasals. External nares circular; each bordered by rostral, two supranasals, first supralabial, and one postnasal. Mental shallowly triangular, shorter (0.60 mm) than wide (0.75 mm). Mental bordered posteriorly by two enlarged postmentals, these bordered posteriorly by slightly enlarged scales that progressively decrease in size posteriorly prior to granular chin scales. First two infralabials bordered below by somewhat enlarged scales; remaining scales below infralabials of approximately same size as throat scales. Supralabials to mid-orbital position eight on each side, to angle of jaw 14 on each side. Infralabials 11 on right, 10 on left. Body of modest habitus (TrL / SVL = 0.51), slightly depressed. Dorsal scales on head, body, limbs, and throat tiny, juxtaposed granules, larger on sides and snout; tubercles absent. Ventral scales larger, flat and smooth, subimbricate, gradually decreasing in size laterally to become granular. Enlarged precloacal / femoral scales in three series of 12 - 16 - 12 scales separated by four slightly smaller scales on right, and three on left; those on thighs only slightly larger than adjacent scales. Precloacal / femoral pores in three series of 12 - 14 - 12. Enlarged scales form a pubic patch between the precloacal series and vent; no row of tiny scales between the precloacal series and either side of the pubic patch; nine scales in a row between apex of enlarged precloacal series and vent. Scales on palms and soles rounded, smooth. Fore- and hindlimbs relatively small but well-developed (FA / SVL = 0.095, CS / SVL = 0.12). Digits well-developed, narrowly dilated throughout their length (T 4 W / T 4 L = 0.27), all but first fingers and toes with recurved claws; clawed phalanges laterally compressed, free above and extending slightly beyond terminal scansors. Subdigital lamellae narrow and smooth, all undivided except for second scansor divided on right first toe; lamellae extend for only slightly more than half length of each toe (T 4 scansor L / T 4 L = 0.54, Fig. 1 D). Lamellae of manus 6 – 8 – 10 – 9 – 7 on right, 7 – 8 – 9 – 9 – 7 on left; of pes 8 – 9 – 9 – 10 – 8 on right, 7 – 9 – 9 – 9 – 8 on left. Relative lengths of digits on manus and pes I
Kraus, Fred (2019): New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands. Zootaxa 4651 (2): 305-329, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4651.2.7

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(2)

FIGURE 1. Dorsal views of holotypes of (A) Lepidodactylus aignanus sp. nov., BPBM 17229, and (B) L. zweifeli sp. nov., AMNH 105088; right foot of holotypes of (C) Lepidodactylus aignanus sp. nov., BPBM 17229, and (D) L. zweifeli sp. nov., AMNH 105088. Scale = 2 mm.

Imageimage/png© Kraus, FredKraus, Fred

FIGURE 2. Map of New Guinea and surrounding islands showing type localities for Lepidodactylus aignanus sp. nov. (diamond), L. dialeukos sp. nov. (triangle), L. kwasnickae sp. nov. (square), L. mitchelli sp. nov. (circle), and L. zweifeli sp. nov. (star).

Imageimage/png© Kraus, FredKraus, Fred

IMAGES

Gallery(2)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Kraus, Fred (2019): New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands. Zootaxa 4651 (2): 305-329, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4651.2.7

Abstract

I describe five new species of Lepidodactylus from New Guinea or adjacent islands that are members of Brown & Parker’s (1977) phenetic Groups I and II and belong to the clades identified as the L. orientalis, L. pumilus, and L. novaeguineae groups of Oliver et al. (2018a). One of the new species is restricted to an isolated mountain range on New Guinea; the remainder inhabit offshore islands ranging from 3–250 km from New Guinea. These species are distinguished from their congeners primarily by unique combinations of toe lamellar numbers and shape, numbers and distribution of enlarged precloacal/femoral scales and pores, toe webbing, toe width, and color pattern. These clades are ancient, and the ancestor of one of them has been on the East Papuan Composite Terrane for at least 28 MY, highlighting the long-term importance of that former large island in generating regional biodiversity. At least one, and probably three, of the new species are inhabitants of forest interiors; one occupies disturbed coastal areas; and the habitat of the last is currently unsurmisable. All of the new species likely have restricted geographic distributions, with four of them being limited to one or a few small islands. As a result of their small ranges, rapid habitat conversion in the ranges of some of these species, and the threat of further habitat loss in the others, most of these species are of conservation concern although it is uncertain if any of them is under immediate threat.

Kraus F, plazi (2019). New species of Lepidodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from New Guinea and adjacent islands. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4651.2.7 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-15.

CC0Published 8/5/2019View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
159043709
Dataset Key
00ad1537-4dda-475f-8007-991dc1f0eac8
Origin
source
Backbone Key
10259957
Taxon ID
3E6D87E38055FFB9FF3E701FDFA2FF2E.taxon
Last Crawled
6/10/2026
Last Interpreted
6/10/2026