AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Chamops segnis

Chamops segnis

Marsh, 1892

GBIF:159397293

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(2)

Figure 8 A-D
Sahni, Ashok (1972): The vertebrate Fauna of the Judith River formation, Montana. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 147 (6): 319-416, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3382461, Hdl: http://hdl.handle.net/2246/1099
A dentary, AMNH 8486 from Clayball Hill, is referred to Chamops segnis on the basis of its resemblance to the type dentary. The jaw is broken posteriorly and contains 13 worn and broken teeth (fig. 8 A, B). The Meckelian fossa is open and extends anteriorly to the second most anterior tooth. The roof of the Meckelian fossa consists of a thick border which considerably widens anteriorly in the form of a lingual expansion when seen in dorsal view. The lower border of the dentary is only slightly curved. The teeth are subpleurodont and tricuspid. The tricuspid nature of the teeth cannot be made out in AMNH 8486, because of excessive wear. A number of other dentary fragments, however, indicate that the teeth are similar to those referred to the genus by Estes (1964). The tooth row is heterodont; the anterior five or six teeth are anteroposteriorly compressed, whereas the posterior ones are less so and possess rounded tooth bases. The linguolabially compressed crowns have a prominent central cusp with smaller anterior and posterior accessory cusps delineated by short but distinct ridges. The anterior cusps are larger than the posterior cusps at the anterior end of the dentary; the anterior and posterior cusps are the same size toward the posterior end. Faint vertical striations are more prominent on the lingual than the labial side of the crowns. Labially the dentary is smooth except for the presence of prominent mental foramina. The foramina are situated closer to the dorsal edge of the dentary. T-he six foramina extend posteriorly to the ninth or tenth tooth from the front. Chamops maxillae, which vary considerably in size, are present in the collection. AMNH 8487 from Clambank Hollow, is a partial tooth-bearing border of a maxilla. It corresponds closely to UCMP 46033, described in detail by Estes (1964, p. 106). AMNH 8488, also from Clambank Hollow, is considerably more robust than AMNH 8487 and probably corresponds to the more massive dentaryjust described (fig. 8 C, D). The anterior part of the maxilla, bearing four teeth, is preserved. The teeth are quite large and show signs of wear. The anterior maxillary teeth are directed backward and are slightly recurved but are otherwise morphologically similar to corresponding teeth on the dentary.
Sahni, Ashok (1972): The vertebrate Fauna of the Judith River formation, Montana. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 147 (6): 319-416, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3382461, Hdl: http://hdl.handle.net/2246/1099

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(1)

FIG. 8. A. Chamops segnis. AMNH 8486, labial view of left dentary. B. Lingual view. Both x 5. C. AMNH 8488, lingual view of left maxilla. D. Labial view. Both x 5. E. cf. Xenosauridae, AMNH 8498, labial view of left maxilla. F. Lingual view. Both x 5. G. Peltosaurus piger, AMNH 8495, lingual view of left maxilla, x 5. H. AMNH 8494, lingual view of right dentary, x 5. I. Paraderma bogerti, AMNH 8504, lingual view of right maxilla. x 5. J. Parasaniwa wyomingensis, AMNH 8499, lingual view of left dentary, x 5. K. Leptochamops denticulatus, AMNH 8491, lingual view of right maxilla, x 5. L. Exostinus lancensis, AMNH 8497, lingual view of right maxilla, x 5. M. Deinodon horridus, AMNH 8513, posterior view of isolated tooth. N. Lateral view. Both x 13. 0. AMNH 8515, lateral view of anterior dentary tooth. P. Posterior view. Both x 13. Q. AMNH 8514, posterior view of?premaxillary tooth. R. Lateral view. Both x 12. S. Paronychodon lacustris, AMNH 8522, lingual view of isolated tooth. T. Labial view. Both x 12. U. Kritosaurus cf. K. breviceps, AMNH 8525, lateral view of isolated tooth. V. Posterior view. Both x 1 2. W. Procheneosaurus altidens, AMNH 8527, labial view of isolated tooth. X. Anterior or posterior view. Both x 12. Y, Z.?Sebecosuchia, AMNH 8549, views of an solated tooth. Both x 10.

Imageimage/png© Sahni, AshokSahni, Ashok

IMAGES

Gallery(1)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

The vertebrate Fauna of the Judith River formation, Montana

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Sahni, Ashok (1972): The vertebrate Fauna of the Judith River formation, Montana. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 147 (6): 319-416, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3382461, Hdl: http://hdl.handle.net/2246/1099

GEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION of the Late Cretaceous Judith River Formation in the area just north of the Judith River on the Missouri River in north-central Montana has resulted in the discovery of varied vertebrate forms. The beds are mainly freshwater continental deposits consisting of crossbedded channel sandstones, gray siltstones, and carbonaceous shales with occasional seams of lignitic coal. The stratigraphic sequence consists of the Marias River Shale overlain by the Eagle, Claggett, Judith River, and Bearpaw formations. The last four constitute the Montana Group. The Judith River Formation is Campanian in age as determined by its position between the fossiliferous marine Claggett and Bearpaw shales.

The fauna was obtained from the upper 50 feet of the formation. The bone concentration in the productive sandstone is the result of size sorting leading to underrepresentation of the larger dinosaurs. Three orders of mammals are represented, the Eutheria by a single genus, the Allotheria by five, and the Metatheria by at least three genera. Teiid and parasaniwid lizards are frequent. Only a fraction of the large number of described dinosaur genera, however, is represented in the collection by isolated teeth. Fish and amphibians form a sizable portion of the fauna.

Vertebrates from the Judith River Formation are more primitive than, but generally similar to, later Maestrichtian species. The mammals differ from their descendants in the Lance Formation at the species level. The community structure and the paleoecology of the fauna of the Judith River Formation resemble those of the Lance Formation. The greatest difference between the two communities is the greater variety of dinosaurs in the earlier formation.

Sahni A, plazi (1972). The vertebrate Fauna of the Judith River formation, Montana. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3382461 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-16.

CC0Published 12/31/1972View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
159397293
Dataset Key
fd03f669-c046-46cd-861a-6bf56b7fc989
Origin
source
Backbone Key
4968325
Taxon ID
1A7187CFFFC9177EFE46F6CBE5215350.taxon
Last Crawled
6/10/2026
Last Interpreted
6/10/2026