AnimaliaacceptedsubfamilyAccepted
Archinominae

Archinominae

Kudenov, 1991

GBIF:209295544

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(1)

Key to genera of Archinominae Kudenov, 1991

(modif. Fauchald 1977a)

1 Notopodia with single dorsal cirri (cirrophore well-defined)... ................................................. 2

– Notopodia with ‘two dorsal cirri’ (one with cirrophore well-defined, the other is a cirriform branchia), at least along a few anterior chaetigers.................................................................................... 4

2(1) Caruncular lateral plates barely developed; first branchiae from chaetiger 2, all branching; notochaetae all furcates, harpoonchaetae missing............................................................... .. Archinome Kudenov, 1991

– Caruncular lateral plates distinct; first complex branchiae from chaetiger 3–5, anterior chaetigers with cirriform branchiae; complex branchiae mostly bipinnate; notochaetae include harpoon furcates with denticles along outer margin............ 3

3(2) Bipinnate branchiae from chaetiger 5, first pair markedly larger than following ones; neurochaetae furcates, major tines with denticles along inner margin; eyes absent.............................................. Bathychloeia Horst, 1910

– Bipinnate branchiae from chaetiger 4 or 5, progressively smaller along posterior region; neurochaetae usually furcates, major tines smooth, rarely with small spurs, or without them (acicular chaetae); eyes present...................................................................................................... Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818

4(1) Caruncle with high central ridge, lateral plates wide.......................................................... 5

– Caruncular lateral plates small, hidden under central ridge, or absent. ............................................ 6

5(4) Branchiae of similar size along body, or decreasing posteriorly.............................. Notopygos Grube, 1855

– First branchiae markedly larger than following ones............................... Bathynotopygos Kucheruk, 1981

6(4) Caruncle wedge-shaped, annulated, without crest and folds; notochaetae harpoon furcates with denticles along a short inner distal margin...................................................................... .. Sangiria Horst, 1911

– Caruncle with crest and folds........................................................................... 7

7(6) Caruncle high, loosely plaited and rugose; notochaetae include harpoon furcates with denticles along outer or inner margins............................................................................. Chloenopsis Fauchald, 1977

– Caruncle low, narrowly plaited with a crenulated plate; notochaetae include harpoon furcates with denticles along a short inner distal margin..................................................................... Parachloeia Horst, 1912

Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Revision of Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (Annelida, Amphinomidae). Zootaxa 5238 (1): 1-134, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1MagnoliaPress via PlaziNo known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

Occurrences with images

Source Information

Revision of Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (Annelida, Amphinomidae)

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. (2023): Revision of Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (Annelida, Amphinomidae). Zootaxa 5238 (1): 1-134, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5238.1.1

Abstract

Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 is the largest genus in the Amphinomidae by including more species than other genera. Members of Chloeia species thrive in mixed substrates or sediments, mostly in tropical waters, and rarely reach deep water, or cold-temperate environments. A recent revision dealt with the species from tropical American seas and resulted in the redescription of five species, and the description of two other new ones. The objective for this additional contribution was to revise type and non-type specimens deposited in 12 of the largest world collections, and by applying a slightly modified approach from the precedent revision. Species were grouped herein after the type of branchiae, the first chaetiger with branchiae, and the dorsal pigmentation pattern. The results include the redescription of 16 species, with C. flava (Pallas, 1766) and C. fusca M’Intosh, 1885 being restricted, and three others reinstated: C. incerta de Quatrefages, 1866; C. fucata de Quatrefages, 1866, and C. pulchella Baird, 1868; 10 species are regarded as indeterminable: C. ancora Frickhinger, 1916; C. bengalensis Kinberg, 1867; C. candida Kinberg, 1857; C. egena Grube, 1855; C. furcigera de Quatrefages, 1866; C. macleayi Haswell, 1879; C. malaica Kinberg, 1867; C. nuda de Quatrefages, 1866; C. quatrefagesii Baird, 1868; and C. rupestris Risso, 1826. Further, 10 recently described species are being diagnosed and compared to their most similar species, but not redescribed; and 17 species are newly described: C. amoureuxi sp. n. from Madagascar, C. bemisae sp. n. from The Philippines, C. boucheti sp. n. from Indonesia, C. fauveli sp. n. from the Bay of Bengal, C. fiegei sp. n. from the Red Sea, C. gesae sp. n. from the Northeastern Atlantic, C. gilleti sp. n. from Western Africa, C. hutchingsae sp. n. from Australia, C. keablei sp. n. from Papua New Guinea, C. mezianei sp. n. from Western Africa, C. murrayae sp. n. from Australia, C. piotrowskiae sp. n. from The Philippines, C. poupini sp. n. from the French Polynesia, C. richeri sp. n. from New Caledonia, C. slapcisnkyi sp. n. from The Philippines, C wangi sp. n. from The Philippines, and C. zibrowii sp. n. from the French Polynesia. Keys to all archinomin genera and to all species of Chloeia are also included.

Salazar-Vallejo S I, plazi (2023). Revision of Chloeia Savigny in Lamarck, 1818 (Annelida, Amphinomidae). Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/sqdwvp accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-14.

CC0Published 2/7/2023View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
209295544
Dataset Key
751096f2-4b5b-43c3-9748-4d07afe044c3
Origin
source
Taxon ID
03C79010FFF9D70FFF707FC6269AFEC9.taxon
Last Crawled
6/9/2026
Last Interpreted
6/9/2026