Hosts. Pontastacus kessleri (Schimkewitsch, 1886) [as Astacus kessleri; for the generic assignment, see Crandall and De Grave (2017)]. Habitat. Present in the branchial chambers of the host (Subchev & Gelder 2010). Affinities. Although species of Branchiobdella are found in both the Euro-Mediterranean and East Asian subregions (Bănărescu 1990), each subregion has its own distinct set of species (Gelder 2019: 488). Branchiobdella turkestanensis is one of five, small (less than 3.0 mm long) Euro-Mediterranean species in this genus (Karaman 1967). Four of these have a spindle-shaped body, while Branchiobdella balcanica Moszyński, 1938, has a slightly dorso-ventrally flattened body with lateral ‘ shoulders’ on segment 4. Branchiobdella italica Canegallo, 1928, and Branchiobdella pentadonta Whitman, 1882, have long, thin glandular atria, leaving both B. kozarovi and B. turkestanensis with short glandular atria that also live on closely related crayfish species, Pontastacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) and P. kessleri respectively, in the southeastern Euro-Mediterranean subregion. With the reexamination of the MNHW material and its designation as a new species, B. turkestanensis, it was necessary to review the morphology of B. kozarovi to support the separation of the two species. The type description by Subchev (1978) contained a number of errors and omissions; these were corrected in a subsequent detailed description by Gelder et al. (1994 b). As reported in the Materials and methods section, the type material was unavailable for loan so other Bulgarian specimens and information were used. Subchev (1978: 78) reported the body length of preserved mature B. kozarovi ranged from 1.0 to 1.7 mm, while the topotypic specimens that I examined (unpub. data) had a mean length of 1.2 mm (n = 14) and range of 0.8 to 1.7 mm. Branchiobdella kozarovi from Ukraine reach over 3.0 mm long (Boshko 1983) or, more precisely, range from 0.9 to 3.5 mm according to Kolesnykova et al. (2008: Fig. 1 a, b). A photograph of a well-preserved specimen from the Netherlands with a scale bar, was calculated to be 4.0 mm long, but the text affirmed a range of body length of just 1.1 to 2.5 mm (Kolesnykova et al. 2012: 102). The longer specimens require further investigation, but they are not relevant here. Subchev (1978) described the jaws of B. kozarovi as being more than half as high as wide when seen in frontal view, but in his fig. 3 these dimensions are almost the same. He noted the presence of “ five or six teeth ” but made no mention of a dental formula. In the 14 specimens I examined (unpubl. data), the jaws were reniform and the dental formula was either 5 / 5 (five specimens), 6 / 5 (5), 5 / 6 (2), 6 / 6 (1) or 7 / 5 (1). Kolesnykova et al. (2008: 79) reported a predominance of 5 / 5, with 5 / 6 and 5 / 7 occurring rarely. The spermatheca length in B. kozarovi is x 1.2 the segment’s diameter, with its duct about subequal to the length of the spindle-shaped bulb that includes an ental process (Fig. 1 H) (modified from Gelder et al. 1994 b: fig. 1) and this agrees with the report in Kolesnykova et al. (2008: Fig. 2). Although the bulb’s diameter varies with the amount of sperm it contains, the length remains about the same. The thick, short glandular atrium is curved although not always pronounced, and the vas deferens reportedly enters into the glandular atrium towards the latter’s ental end (Gelder et al. 1994 b) or at its mid-point (Kolesnykova et al. 2008: fig. 2). The muscular atrium is subequal in length to that of the glandular atrium. The length and position of oviducts are not used as taxonomic characters; however, it is notable that Kolesnykova et al. (2008: fig. 2) showed a pair of long oviducts apparently opening to the exterior of segment 8 (her XII). If this is correct, their length and failure to open on the external surface of segment 7 would be unique to this species of branchiobdellidan. The diagnostic characteristics often employed to identify branchiobdellidan species, such as external features of the body, body length, dental formulae and shape and size of the jaws, are not significantly different in B. turkestanensis and B. kozarovi. These two species are separable from each other by differences in the morphology of the spermatheca and male reproductive organs, specifically their size, length and shape. Most noticeably, in B. turkestanensis (Fig. 1 G) these organs are approximately half the relative size of those in B. kozarovi (Fig. 1 H). In B. turkestanensis the spermatheca length is about 0.6 x the segment’s diameter, and the ovoid bulb is about x 1.5 longer than the duct. In contrast, the spermatheca in B. kozarovi is about equal or longer than the segment diameter, with a terete bulb and ental process together being similar in length to the duct. Branchiobdella turkestanensis has a terete glandular atrium that is less than half as long as the muscular atrium, while B. kozarovi has a curved, wide and tubular glandular atrium that is subequal in length to the muscular atrium. Among branchiobdellidans, differences of this sort have previously been considered sufficient to justify the separation of B. italica from B. pentadonta (Gelder et al. 1994 a: 181) and Cambarincola vitrea Ellis, 1918 from Cambarincola osceola Hoffman, 1963 (Hoffman 1963: 325).
Gelder, Stuart R. (2024): Description of Branchiobdella turkestanensis n. sp. (Annelida: Clitellata) following a reexamination of specimens in the Natural History Museum Vienna, Austria. Zootaxa 5477 (5): 579-586, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.5, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5477.5.5