AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Hoplobatrachus occipitalis

Hoplobatrachus occipitalis

(Gunther, 1858)

GBIF:304193274

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(1)

Hoplobatrachus occipitalis (Günther, 1858)

Specimen.

Angola: “ W. Africa ”: BMNH 1872.2.15.1 .

Comments.

Bocage (1864 b) described Rana bragantina based on a specimen from Duque de Bragança but shortly thereafter referred it to the synonymy of Günther’s Rana occipitalis (Bocage 1866 a, 1895 a). The two authors exchanged letters in 1869 regarding the identity of two frogs that Bocage sent to the British Museum under the genus Rana (AHMB /CE/G85, NHMA /DF/ZOO/200/1/189, 190). One of the specimens was sent by Bocage as “ No. 3. Rana plicigula nov. sp. ” (Fig. 3) and was identified by Günther as Rana occipitalis . Although the original label with the number mentioned in the letter is missing, the specimen in question certainly corresponds to BMNH 1872.2.15.1, while the other specimen, identified with the number 5 both in the letters and the specimen label represents Amietia angolensis (see respective account). Both specimens were cited by Boulenger (1882 b) as Rana occipitalis . The name Rana plicigula is stated in the exchanged letters, the register and the label on the jar of BMNH 1872.2.15.1, but it never appeared in a published form, as it was a working name for a species that Bocage intended to describe before knowing Günther’s opinion. Although there is no precise locality associated with the British Museum specimen, Bocage (1895 a) knew the species only from Duque de Bragança, Dondo, Ambaca, Novo Redondo and Catumbela.

Parrinha, Diogo, Calado, Francisco M. G., Marques, Mariana P., Bauer, Aaron M., Ceríaco, Luis M. P. (2025): Echoes of a lost museum: Revision of the herpetological collections sent by Barbosa du Bocage from the Lisbon Museum to the British Museum of Natural History. Vertebrate Zoology 75: 353-404, DOI: 10.3897/vz.75.e169790Pensoft via PlaziNo known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(1)

Figure 3. Sources of data examined. A Register noting specimens presented by Bocage; B Specimen jar with external label; C Original specimen label with locality and number mentioned in Bocage’s letter; D Extract of Bocage’s letter citing numbered specimens (NHMA / DF / ZOO / 235 / 1 / 1 / 1 / 76). Photos by DP.

Imageimage/png© Parrinha, Diogo;Calado, Francisco M. G.;Marques, Mariana P.;Bauer, Aaron M.;Ceríaco, Luis M. P.Parrinha, Diogo;Calado, Francisco M. G.;Marques, Mariana P.;Bauer, Aaron M.;Ceríaco, Luis M. P.

IMAGES

Gallery(1)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

Echoes of a lost museum: Revision of the herpetological collections sent by Barbosa du Bocage from the Lisbon Museum to the British Museum of Natural History

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Parrinha, Diogo, Calado, Francisco M. G., Marques, Mariana P., Bauer, Aaron M., Ceríaco, Luis M. P. (2025): Echoes of a lost museum: Revision of the herpetological collections sent by Barbosa du Bocage from the Lisbon Museum to the British Museum of Natural History. Vertebrate Zoology 75: 353-404, DOI: 10.3897/vz.75.e169790

Abstract

As part of a nineteenth century scientific network, José Vicente Barbosa du Bocage regularly sent “duplicate” specimens from the zoological collections of the National Museum of Lisbon to natural history museums across Europe. These duplicates gained exceptional significance following the 1978 fire that destroyed the Lisbon Museum’s zoological collections, making them the last surviving representatives of its historical holdings. Despite their importance for taxonomic and nomenclatural stability, the full extent of Bocage’s duplicate specimens remains poorly documented. Here we present a comprehensive and integrative revision of the herpetological material sent by Bocage to the British Museum of Natural History. We assess its historical, taxonomic and nomenclatural value, providing an illustrated and annotated catalogue of type specimens. A total of 92 specimens representing 57 species were sent from Lisbon between 1864 and 1896, including 30 type specimens for 27 nominal taxa. We provide evidence for the correction of the type locality associated with the only surviving syntype of Agama anchietae, as well as the recognition of previously unknown types of Chioglossa lusitanica, Hylambates angolensis, Hylambates cynnamomeus, Cystignathus bocagii, Hyperolius insignis, Hyperolius huillensis, Hemidactylus cessacii and Ophirhina anchietae.

Parrinha D, Calado F M G, Marques M P, Bauer A M, Ceríaco L M P, pensoft (2025). Echoes of a lost museum: Revision of the herpetological collections sent by Barbosa du Bocage from the Lisbon Museum to the British Museum of Natural History. Vertebrate Zoology. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/mu7a9c accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-18.

CC0Published 10/22/2025View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
304193274
Dataset Key
feb63d25-76a8-4bff-bba1-156efd22611e
Origin
source
Backbone Key
2430378
Taxon ID
4118B47C0F8E541A9CAAF4BD3C86D167.taxon
Last Crawled
6/15/2026
Last Interpreted
6/15/2026