AnimaliaNot EvaluatedacceptedspeciesAccepted
Archaebranchinecta pollicifera

Archaebranchinecta pollicifera

(Harding, 1940)

GBIF:159654550

0year

ABOUT

Descriptions(5)

(Figs. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11)
Cohen, Rosa Graciela, Marinone, María Cristina, Adamowicz, Sarah J. (2019): A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano. Zootaxa 4683 (1): 55-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4683.1.3
Redescription. Male. Cuticle ornamentation as in the present diagnosis of the genus (see below) .. Compound eyes mean diameter: 0.6 mm (0.4 – 0.6; n = 16), on average 1.3 times larger (1.2 – 1.5, n = 38) than in females (Tables 3, 4). First antennae partially multi-articulated with incomplete rings (Fig. 2 A, B). Second antennae basal antennomere, with a basal swollen bulge (bb), on the anterior surface, near the medial edge (Figs. 2 A, B; 3 A – C). The basal bulge is paved by small, slightly convex cuticular plates, some of them rise and point anteromedially, forming triangular denticles (td) arranged in circular groups around a central hyaline sensory seta (ss) (Fig. 2 B, D). The basal antennomere also bears on the anterior surface a more distal swollen bulge (db) (Figs. 2 A, B; 3 C), similarly paved with small convex plates which do not rise as denticles, and scattered warty sensory areas surrounding a hyaline seta (Fig. 2 B). Posteromedially at the same level, a spherical knob hangs from a peduncle as a pedunculate process (pp) (Figs. 2 A, B; 3 A; 4 A, C); the peduncle has a granulous cuticle, whereas the spherical tip is ornate with tightly arranged mesetiform elements with interspersed setae (Fig. 4 C). More distally in the basal antennomere, and also protruding from its posteromedial surface, there is a conspicuous digitiform process (dp), elongate, slightly curved, medially directed (Figs. 2 A; 3 A; 4 A, C), almost making contact in the midline with the digitiform process of the opposite side (Figs. 2 A; 4 A). The digitiform process is ornamented with sharp denticles that are more developed on the surface just opposite to the ornate tip of the pedunculate process; from this surface to both sides, denticles gradually flatten until disappearing, so that the cuticle appears almost smooth (Fig. 4 A, C). At the level of the origin of the digitiform process but on the medial surface of the basal antennomere there is a transverse oblique crest or medial crest (mc) (Figs. 3 B; 4 C) that protrudes posteromedially into a small process (sp) (Figs. 3 A, B; 4 A, C, D), usually ending in two rounded posteromedial tips, one more prominent than the other, adopting together a cordiform shape; the small process seems to prevent the digitiform process of its own side from moving beyond; the small process is ornamented with columnar grooved spines (cs) distally divided into several irregular points, scattered simple smooth spines, and interspersed hyaline sensory setae (Fig. 4 B, C, D). The second antenna distal antennomere bends from its anterior surface in posteromedial direction, ending in a rounded spatulate tip. A little beyond its proximal articulation, the anterolateral surface of the antennomere protrudes like a vertical globose triangular ledge (ld) with proximal base (Figs. 2 A; 3 A – C), which narrows in distal direction and ends up at the distal third of the lateral edge of the antennomere. A wide rasp-like area covered with conspicuous mesetiform ornamentations, is observed from the tip of the appendage to the posterior and medial surfaces of the distal antennomere. Mandibles asymmetric, showing no sexual dimorphism (Fig. 6 A, B); maxillae 1 and 2 as typical in Branchinectidae. Thoracopods as in the present diagnosis of the genus (see below). Genital and abdominal segments. Abdominal segment II (second postgenital segment) as herein redescribed in the genus, bearing a pair of ovoid ventrolateral denticulate protuberances (vp), close to its posterior articulation, showing diverse degrees of separation from each other in different specimens (Fig. 7 A, B). Pairs of similarly ornate but less prominent areas were observed in equal positions, near the posterior articulation of abdominal segments IV and VI. Besides, both genital segments present a conspicuous pair of dorsal warty sensory areas, also observed in several abdominal segments. Gonopods (gp) widely separated, extending ventrolaterally, with their non-eversible portions partially visible in dorsal view; very long when completely everted, reaching abdominal segments III or the beginning of IV (Fig. 7 A). The rigid basal portion of gonopods bears a medial sclerotized projection with two processes (pr) (Fig. 7 A); in addition, laterally in the basal portion there is a ventral pair of granulous mounds (gm) (Fig. 7 A, B). In ventral view, near the distal edge of the second genital segment and between the rigid basal portions of both gonopods, there is a pair of protruding genital bulges (pgb), distally rounded, and next to each other at the midline; in lateral view they are conspicuously prominent (Fig. 7 A, B). Each eversible portion of the gonopods shows two dentate warts in its distal part (Fig. 7 A). Both warts are forwardly and obliquely directed, and bear 6 to 8 short marginal spines; one of the warts is medial and close to the tip of the gonopod and the other is dorsal and located at three quarters of the length of the everted portion of the gonopod (Fig. 7 A). No anterior or lateral longitudinal rows of denticles were observed on the retractile part of the gonopod. Internal structure of the male genital segments (Fig. 8 A) as described in the present diagnosis of the genus (see below). Testes reach abdominal segments I to III (Fig. 8 A). Uropods (or cercopods) length: 1.4 mm (1.0 – 1.7 mm; n = 16), slightly longer than in females (male uropod / female uropod: 1.2 (1.0 – 1.4); n = 38), on average 3 times as long as the anal segment (or telson) (2.6 – 3.8; n = 16) (Tables 3, 4), divergent, uniformly provided with marginal plumose setae. Female. Cuticule ornamentation as in male. Compound eyes smaller than in male, mean diameter: 0.4 mm (0.4 – 0.5 mm; n = 25) (Table 4). First antennae as in male. Second antennae as in the genus, presenting a cheliform aspect (Fig. 9 B); indeed, the specific epithet “ pollicifera ” proposed by Harding (1940) alludes to this character. The anterior surface of the antenna as well as the medial projection (mp), including its tip, present warty sensory areas (sa) associated with a central seta (Fig. 9 F). Instead, the apical projection (ap) of the appendage lacks sensory areas. In some locations the specimens show a pair of medial bulges (mb) (Fig. 9 B). Mandibles as in male (Fig. 6 A). Maxillae 1 and 2 as typical in Branchinectidae. Thoracopods as in the present diagnosis of the genus (see below). Thoracic ornamentation. Thoracomers 9 or 10 to 12 (first genital segment) showing a pair of dorsal evaginations confluent at the midline, close to the posterior articulation of each segment, which gradually increase in size in the posterior direction (Figs. 10 A, B). In segment 9, when present, confluent evaginations end in two close rounded tips; in thoracomers 10 to 12, the confluent evaginations end in two close conical points; sometimes, the strongest conical dorsal points in the first genital segment show laterally a conspicuous sensory area with an associated seta or with a little spine. Thoracomer 13 (second genital segment) with a ventrolateral strong spine (sg 2), curved, posteriorly directed, just above the brood pouch (Fig. 10 A, B, C), and a pair of dorsal warty sensory areas associated with a central hyaline seta, which may be either a conspicuous dorsal mound or barely prominent. Abdominal segment II bearing a pair of ovoid ventrolateral denticulate protuberances (vp) (Fig. 10 E) as in males (Fig. 10 A), which may be hidden by the brood pouch; similar but smaller structures were also observed in abdominal segments IV and VI. Ovaries T-shaped, extending to abdominal segments I – III, or rarely to IV – V. Brood pouch subcylindrical, rounded at the tip with the gonopore (go), bearing at its distal third a pair of small ventrolateral cuticular rounded outgrowths (lo) with cuticular granulations as in the whole brood pouch (Figs. 10 A, C, D). Brood pouch reaching abdominal segments II – IV, or more rarely the middle of V. Uropods (or cercopods) length: 1.2 mm (0.8 – 1.8 mm; n = 25), slightly shorter than in male (Tables 3, 4), on average 2.4 times as long as the anal segment (or telson) (1.7 – 3.0; n = 25), divergent, uniformly provided with plumose marginal setae (Table 4). Cysts (resistant eggs): two kinds of cysts were found in the brood pouches of Archaebranchinecta, being type I the most common in both species. Type I cyst in A. pollicifera: spherical, mean diameter: 246.4 µm (196 – 262 μm; n = 11), surface sculptured with ridges defining numerous cells (9 to 11) across the egg diameter, cells irregularly sized, subcircular or oval, mean dimensions: 23 – 30 µm (18 – 34 to 29 – 32 µm; n = 24), either isolated or coalescent (more frequently in pairs up to 5 cells delimited by narrower and lower ridges), cell groups either lined up or form- ing diverse arrays (since type I cysts are similar in both species, Fig. 11 A corresponds to A. aimara); each cell forms a shallow depression with grained bottom (Fig. 11 C); ridges steep-sided and narrow except at intersections. Type II cyst: found together with type I cyst in Pe- 29 and Pe- 30, at the northern reach of our sampling area. Spherical (Fig. 11 B), mean diameter: 204 μm (174 – 248 μm; n = 6), surface sculptured with ridges defining few large cells (6 to 8) across the egg diameter, cells irregularly sized, subcircular or oval, mean dimensions: 37 – 47 µm (24 – 38 to 61 – 67 µm; n = 22), either isolated or coalescent; with flat-bottomed grained depressions (Fig. 11 D); wide ridges with flat tops and sloping sides. Size. male total length from the front to the tip of uropods (or cercopods) excluding setae: 12 mm (8 – 14 mm; n = 16); measurements of other characters in Table 3. Female total length from the front to the tip of uropods (or cercopods) excluding setae: 13 mm (10 – 19 mm; n = 25); measurements of other characters in Table 4.
Cohen, Rosa Graciela, Marinone, María Cristina, Adamowicz, Sarah J. (2019): A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano. Zootaxa 4683 (1): 55-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4683.1.3
Diagnosis. Male. Pedunculate process of second antennae basal antennomere, mushroom-shaped; digitiform process elongate, almost making contact in the midline with the digitiform process of the opposite side; small process projecting conspicuously from the medial crest, usually ending in two rounded posteromedial tips, adopting together a cordiform shape; pedunculate process length / digitiform process length: 1.0 (0.8 – 1.2; n = 16). Either in ventral or in lateral view, a pair of conspicuously protruding genital bulges appears between the basal rigid portions of the gonopods. Female. Second antennae with a strong medial projection. Ornamentation of thoracomers 9 or 10 to 12 (first genital segment), presenting a pair of prominent dorsal evaginations confluent at the midline and close to the posterior joint of each segment, gradually increasing in size in posterior direction, usually rounded in thoracomer 9 and ending in conical points in thoracomers 10 to 12. Thoracomer 13 (second genital segment) with a pair of usually prominent dorsal sensory areas and a ventrolateral strong spine, just above the brood pouch. Brood pouch subcylindrical, bearing a pair of small ventrolateral rounded outgrowths in its distal third.
Cohen, Rosa Graciela, Marinone, María Cristina, Adamowicz, Sarah J. (2019): A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano. Zootaxa 4683 (1): 55-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4683.1.3
Distribution and ecology. A. pollicifera was found in high-elevation (3,825 – 4,260 m a. s. l.) freshwater temporary habitats, such as ponds, pools, roadside ditches, and waru-warus (irrigation channels amid raised agricultural beds), in the surroundings of the western shores of the Lakes Titicaca and Arapa, and in little farm dams (artificial agricultural ponds) and pools in “ bofedales ” by Lake Lagunillas, Peru (Table 1, Fig. 1). All of these water bodies were small to medium-sized, shallow (30 – 60 cm), mostly turbid and argillaceous, with sandy substrate, except for pools in “ bofedales ” (peat-bogs), which were clear, with macrophytes. The type locality by Harding (1940) in Capachica Peninsula corresponds to our sample Pe- 19, Puno Department, Peru (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Cohen, Rosa Graciela, Marinone, María Cristina, Adamowicz, Sarah J. (2019): A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano. Zootaxa 4683 (1): 55-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4683.1.3
Material examined (Table 1, Fig. 1). Samples from 7 temporary freshwater habitats in the surrounding of the western shores of Lake Titicaca and Lake Arapa, and from Lake Lagunillas, in the Peruvian Altiplano. Colls. S. J. Adamowicz, M. C. Marinone and S. A. Menu Marque, January 19 to 21, 2008.
Cohen, Rosa Graciela, Marinone, María Cristina, Adamowicz, Sarah J. (2019): A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano. Zootaxa 4683 (1): 55-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4683.1.3

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(10)

FIGURE 1. Distribution of Archaebranchinecta in the South American Altiplano. Grey circles: new sites for A. aimara sp. nov.; white circle with a black dot: type locality for A. aimara sp. nov.(Bo-44); black star: new site near Tiwanaku for A. aimara sp. nov. (Bo-18); black squares: new sites for A. pollicifera. Published localities: white square: type locality for A. pollicifera in Capachica Peninsula; white circle: paratype locality for A. pollicifera in Cochabamba by Harding (1940), which most probably belongs to A. aimara sp. nov.; crossed white circle: redescription site for A. pollicifera in Sajama National Park by Rogers & Coronel (2011), herein assigned to A. aimara sp. nov.; and black triangles: first report sites for Archaebranchinecta in northern Argentina.

Imageimage/png© Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.

FIGURE 2. Male head in Archaebranchinecta. A, A. pollicifera Pe-30, anterior view. B, A. pollicifera Pe-30, detail of basal and distal swollen bulges in basal antennomere of second antenna, anterior view. C, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-52, anterior view. D, A. pollicifera Pe-22, detail of basal bulge in basal antennomere of second antenna, anterior view. Scale bars: A and C: 500 µm; B: 250 µm; D: 50 µm.

Imageimage/png© Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.

FIGURE 3. Drawing of male head of Archaebranchinecta pollicifera Pe-22, counter-clockwise rotation. A, anterior view. B, anteromedial view. C, lateral view. Scale bar: 500 µm.

Imageimage/png© Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.

FIGURE 4. Archaebranchinecta pollicifera male, processes of basal antennomere of second antenna. A, Pe-29, posterior view. B, Pe-29, detail of ornamentation of the more prominent posteromedial tip of the small process. C, Pe-22, detail of small process with its medial crest and posteromedial cordiform tip, anteromedial view. D, Pe-22, detail of ornamentation with columnar grooved spines of cordiform tip of small process. Scale bars: A: 250 µm; B: 20 µm; C: 100 µm; D: 50 µm.

Imageimage/png© Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.

FIGURE 6. Mandibles in Archaebranchinecta. A, A. pollicifera Pe-30 female, left mandible with supernumerary tooth. B, A. pollicifera Pe-29 male, right mandible. C, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-45 male, left mandible. D, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-52 male, left mandible. Scale bars: A, B, C, and D: 50 µm.

Imageimage/png© Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.

FIGURE 7. Male genital segments in Archaebranchinecta. A, A. pollicifera Pe-22, ventral view. B, A. pollicifera Pe-22, lateral view. C, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-18, detail of ventrolateral denticulate protuberance in abdominal segment II. D, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-18, everted gonopod. E, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-52, detail of gonopod dentate wart. F, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-35, lateral view. G, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-35, detail of low genital bulges, ventral view. H, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-18, lateral view. I, A. aimara sp. nov. Bo-18, ventral view. Scale bars: A, B, F, G, H, and I: 500 µm; C: 50 µm; D and E: 100 µm.

Imageimage/png© Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.Cohen, Rosa Graciela;Marinone, María Cristina;Adamowicz, Sarah J.

IMAGES

Gallery(10)

See Gallery

Occurrences with images

Source Information

A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano

checklist

This dataset contains the digitized treatments in Plazi based on the original journal article Cohen, Rosa Graciela, Marinone, María Cristina, Adamowicz, Sarah J. (2019): A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano. Zootaxa 4683 (1): 55-83, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4683.1.3

Abstract

A detailed morphological comparison was carried out among specimens of several samples of Archaebranchinecta Rogers & Coronel, 2011 from the Altiplano of Peru, Bolivia, and Argentina. Surprisingly, striking differences were found between Peruvian samples collected near the western shore of Lake Titicaca, and those from Bolivia taken southwardly, near the east coasts of River Desaguadero and Lake Poopó. Accordingly, the new species Archaebranchinecta aimara sp. nov. is described, representing the second specific entity of a genus that so far included only A. pollicifera (Harding, 1940). The main differential features between both species include: (a) size and shape of the three processes of basal segment of the male second antenna; (b) shape and protrusion degree of the pair of medioventral bulges in the male genital segments; (c) presence or absence of strong ventrolateral spine on the second genital segment of female; and (d) presence or absence of a pair of ventrolateral outgrowths in the brood pouch. This research contributes to our understanding of the biodiversity and endemism of the unique Altiplano region of South America.

Cohen R G, Marinone M C, Adamowicz S J, plazi (2019). A new species of Archaebranchinecta (Anostraca: Branchinectidae) from the South American Altiplano. Plazi.org taxonomic treatments database. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4683.1.3 accessed via GBIF.org on 2026-06-14.

CC0Published 10/7/2019View dataset
GBIF Usage Key
159654550
Dataset Key
2be87c77-f417-48ed-bb1c-3fe9fca4d1e5
Origin
source
Backbone Key
9694538
Taxon ID
03D1879AFF953779CABF6761FAA1FD1C.taxon
Last Crawled
6/10/2026
Last Interpreted
6/10/2026