AnimaliaacceptedgenusAccepted

Arrhopalites

Blegkuglespringere(+2)·C.Börner, 1906

GBIF:2122170

0countries

0datasets

0year

Descendants

Synonyms

Children

Species

PROFILE

Species Profile

Characteristics

Extant

ABOUT

Descriptions(16)

Key for identification of neotropical Arrhopalites

1 Anal valve cuticular spines absent ................................................................................ 2

Anal valve cuticular spines present............................................................................... 8

2 Ant IV not subdivided, all unguis with a filamentous inner tooth ................ A. diversus

Ant IV subdivided, inner teeth not filamentous when present ..................................... 3

3 Ant IV subdivided into 5 subsegments ......................................................................... 4

Ant IV subdivided into 6 or more subsegments............................................................ 7

4 Ant III basal swelling present........................................................................................ 5

Ant III basal swelling absent......................................................................................... 6

5 Female subanal appendages spoon shaped with fringed edges (4d) ............ A. plectrifer

Female subanal appendages a simple rod withfringed apex (14a) ................... A. dubius

6 Female subanal appendages branche or deeply serrated (5c) ......................... A. benitus

Female subanal appendages simple rod with fringed apex (1ad) ................ A. pygmaeus

7 Ant IV subdivided into 6 subsegments, eyes 1+1 ........................................... A. amarus

Ant IV subdivided into 7 subsegments, eyes 2+2 ....................................... A. bellingeri

8 Eyes 2+2....................................................................................................................... 9

Eyes 1+1..................................................................................................................... 10

9 Ant IV subdivided into 4 ringed subsegments, anal valve C1 lamelate ........ A. amorimi

Ant IV subdivided into 6 ringed subsegments, C1 swollen basally................................ ...................................................................................................... A. heteroculatus sp.n.

10 Ant IV not subdivided. ............................................................................................... 11

Ant IV subdivided ....................................................................................................... 14

11 Dental id3 present, medial ve1 spinelike. .................................................................. 12

Dental id3 absent, ve1 normal..................................................................................... 13

12 Anal valve C3–C6 lamellate, all ungues with tunica and inner tooth .............. A. caecus

C3–C6 swollen basally, first unguis without inner tooth, tunica absent ............ A. millsi

13 Anal valve upper flap with 4 cuticular spines (s0 absent), tunica absent ........ A. harveyi

anal valve upper flap with 5 spines (s0 present), tunica present. A. alambariensis sp.n.

14 Ant IV subdivided into 5 ringed subsegments ........................................................... 15

Ant IV subdivided into 6 ringed subsegments ............................................................ 16

15 Anal valve C1 lamellate, first unguis without tunica ................... A. botuveraensis sp.n.

Anal valve C1 swollen basally, all unguis with tunica ............................... A. vazquezae

16 Tunica absent, anal valve C1 swollen basally ............................................. A. lawrencei

Tunica present, anal valve C1 lamellate...................................................................... 17

17 Cephalic setae M3–5 not spinelike, dental E4–5 spinelike, third unguiculus without apical filament .............................................................................................. A. gnaspinii

Cephalic M3–5 spinelike, dental E4–5 normal, third unguiculus with short apical fila ment not exceeding theunguis tip................................................... A. paranaensis sp.n.

The genus Arrhopalites Börner, 1906 (Collembola, Appendiciphora, Arrhopalitidae) in the Neotropical Region, with description of four new cave species from BrazilMagnoliaPress via PlaziNo known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.

Genus Arrhopalites Börner, 1906

Syn.: Pseudarrhopalites Stach, 1945: 7

Coecarrhopalites Yosii, 1954: 68

One species recorded in Vietnam, and some unidentified specimens from Phú Th ọ (Xuân Sõn national park) (EC: Nguy ễn H. T. & Nguy ễn T. T. 2011 b), Hà N ội (Ba Vì national park) (EC: Nguy ễn V. Q. & Nguy ễn T. T. 2014. CI: Nguy ễn T. T. A. et al. 2021), Hýng Yên (Ðông Mai) (CI: Nguy ễn T. T. A. 2009), Đ ồng Nai (Cát Tiên national park) (EC: Shveenkova 2011), Kiên Giang (Hòn Chông) (CI: Deharveng et al. 2009).

Catalogue of Vietnamese springtails (Hexapoda, Collembola)

Type species. Sminthurus caecus Tullberg, 1871.

Catalogue of Vietnamese springtails (Hexapoda, Collembola)

Key to species of the Caucasian Arrhopalites Börner, 1906

1 Spine-like setae on head dorsum present; cuticular spines on female Abd VI present; claws without clear modifications; tip of mucro swollen....................................................................................... 2

- Spine-like setae on head dorsum absent; cuticular spines on female Abd VI absent; claws much elongated; tip of mucro not swollen............................................................................................. 3

2 Head dorsum with 13 spine-like setae; antenna about 1,5× head length; Ant III not modified; Ant IV without distinct subsegmentation; claw III with inner tooth and tunica......................... A. caecus (Tullberg, 1871) (troglophile)

- Head dorsum with 9 spine-like setae; antenna 2× head length; Ant III with basal swelling; Ant IV with 5–7 subsegments separated by several weakly developed annuli; claw III without inner tooth and tunica.............................................................................................. A. abchasicus Vargovitsh, 2013 (troglobiont)

3 Head dorsum with three axial setae; empodium III without corner tooth; dorsal valve of female Abd VI with 11 + 2 axial setae per side........................................................... A. colchicus Vargovitsh, 2025 (troglobiont)

- Head dorsum with four axial setae; empodium III with corner tooth; dorsal valve of female Abd VI with 10 + 2 axial setae per side................................................................................................ 4

4 Circumanal setae broadened, finely denticulated, and laterally serrated; appendices anales smooth and acuminate; femur II with 12 setae; claws I and II without inner tooth............................. A. macronyx Vargovitsh, 2012 (troglobiont)

- Circumanal setae ordinary; appendices anales apically denticulated; femur II with 13 setae; claws I and II with minute inner tooth............................................................ A. profundus Vargovitsh, 2022 (troglobiont)

Antennal troglomorphy in Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) with the description of two new cave Pygmarrhopalites Vargovitsh, 2009 species from the Arabika Massif in the CaucasusMagnoliaPress via PlaziNo known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.

KEY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF THE ASIAN Arrhopalites .

1 Ventral dental seta ve5 present ...................................................................................... 2

Ve5 never present .......................................................................................................... 7

2 Anal valve spines 3+2 on each side ............................................................................. 3

Anal valve spines 2+2 or 2+1 or absent ........................................................................ 4

3 Seta E1011 of the anal valve absent, dorsal dental setae E67 present, L4 spinelike, ventral setae of dens 3:2:1:1:1, ant. iv with 5 ringed subsegments. A. antrobius (fig. 2)

Setae E1011 of the anal valve present, dorsal dental setae E7 absent, L4 absent, ventral setae of dens 3:2:2:1:1, ant. Iv with 6 ringed subsegments, first unguis without tunica A. anulifer

4 Anal valve spines absent ............................................................................................... 5

Anal valve spines present.............................................................................................. 6

5 Ant. iv not subsegmented, all ungues with inner tooth, all unguiculi with corner tooth, dental Id23 absent, eyes absent............................................................... A. pukouensis

Ant. iv with 7 ringed subsegments, no inner tooth, no corner tooth, dental Id23 present, 1+1 eyes present ....................................................................................... A. gul

6 Anal valve spines 2+2 on each side, ventral dental setae 3:2:1:1, anal valve setae C36 basally swollen or weakly lamellate, tenaculum with one seta on anterior process, unguis I without inner tooth...................................................................…....... A. nivalis

Anal valve spines 2+1 on each side, ventral dental setae 3:2:1:1:1, anal valve setae C3 6 clearly lamellate, tenaculum with two setae on anterior process, unguis I with a small inner tooth .......................................................................................... A. minutus (fig. 6)

7 Anal valve seta C1 forked,.............................................................................................8

Anal valve seta C1 not forked ...................................................................................... 9

8 Female subanal appendage rodlike, flattened and barbed in distal two thirds, C26 swollen basally, D5, E910 present, no tunica................................…... A. habei (fig. 4)

Female subanal appendage forked and laterally serrated, C26 as normal setae, D5, E910 absent, ungues II and III with tunica.......................................….. A. carpathicus

9 Eyes absent, ant. iv with 15 subsegments........................................….. A. uenoi (fig. 8)

Eyes present, ant. Iv with 8 subsegments or less.............................….........................10

10 Dental seta E2 not spinelike, E3 strongly spinelike ................................................... 11

Dental seta E2 and E3 spinelike..............................................................…….............14

11 AnalvalvesetaeC16notswollenbasally,subanalappendageforkedandexternallyserrated A. chiangdaoensis

Anal valve setae C16 swollen basally, subanal appendage not forked ..................... 12

12 AnalvalvesetaC78basallyswollen,D5absent,dentalId23present,ant.iiibasallyswollen A. alticola (fig. 1)

Anal valve setae C78 not swollen basally, D5 present, dental Id23 absent, ant. Iii not swollen basally ........................................................................................................... 13

13 Ant. iv with 7 subsegments, cephalic spines absent, anal valve setae C26 slightly swollen basally, subanal appendage broadly flattened with distal half serrated ............ ................................................................................................................ A. nanjingensis

Ant. iv with 5 subsegments, cephalic spines present, anal valve setae C26 strongly swollen basally, subanal appendage deeply serrate in palmate fashion ... A. kolymensis

14 Ant. iii without basal swelling......................................................….........................15

Ant. iii with basal swelling................................................................……...................16

15 All unguiculi with corner tooth, supplementary IL present in posterior part of head, ant. iv with 7 subsegments, female subanal appendage deeply serrate .......................... ....................................................................................................... A. yosii sp. n. (fig. 9)

Third unguiculus without corner tooth, supplementary IL absent in the posterior part of head, ant. iv with 5 subsegments, female subanal appendage rodlike and laterally serrated at the distal third ................................................................................. A. ruseki

16 Anal valve setae C36 laterally branched or serrate..................... A. changbaishanensis

Anal valve setae not branched or serrate laterally....................................................... 17

17 Anal valve setae C26 slightly swollen basally, D5, E8 and E1011 absent, D7 present, female subanal appendage rodlike, straight with serrate apex, ant. iv not subsegmented A. enzoensis sp. n. (fig. 3)

Anal valve setae C26 clearly swollen basally, D5, E8 and E11 present, D7 absent, female subanal appendage deeply serrate, ant. iv subsegmented............................... 18

18 Ant. iv 7 subdivided, cephalic M5 spinelike, female subanal appendage deeply serrate at the apex, dental L4, E7 and Id3 absent, no corner teeth, anal valve C34 weakly lamellate, E10 present ................................................................ A. octacanthus (fig. 7)

Ant. iv 8 subdivided, cephalic M5 absent, female subanal appendage serrate from the second third towards the tip, dental L4, E7 and Id3 present, anal valve C34 not lamellate E10 absent ................................................................................ A. japonicus (fig. 5)

The genus Arrhopalites (Collembola, Arrhopalitidae) in Asia, with the description of two new Japanese species of Yosiis collectionMagnoliaPress via PlaziNo known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.

Genus Arrhopalites Börner, 1906

Syn.: Coecarrhopalites Yosii, 1954: 68

Remark. Seven morphospecies of which four in Doi Inthanon (Bedos 1994), one in Chiang Rai province (Deharveng 1987 c), one in Phang Nga province (Deharveng & Bedos 1988), one in Nakhon Ratchasima province (Wiwatwitaya & Takeda 2005). The taxonomic status of the different forms is not known, except the morphospecies of Doi Inthanon.

An annotated checklist of the Collembolan fauna of Thailand

Distribution in Thailand. Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai (N), Nakhon Ratchasima (NE), Phang Nga (P). Habitat: cave in Chiang Rai and Phang Nga province; mostly above 1700 m in Doi Inthanon forest; soil s. l. in dry evergreen lowland forest in Nakhon Ratchasima province (Wiwatwitaya & Takeda 2005).

An annotated checklist of the Collembolan fauna of Thailand

Diagnosis. Genus of Arrhopalitidae with characters: trichobothrial pattern of caecus - type (ABC form an angle towards 90 º, AB ≥ BC); secondary seta FS is absent in fore and mid tibiotarsi; cuticular spines on anal valves present or in some species secondarily lost; anterior surface of dens with 5 (seldom with 4) transversal rows of setae, anterodistal seta as a spine or simple; shape of mucronal apex more or less globular; Ant IV often undivided or indistinctly divided on subsegments; head with single exceptions bears spine-like setae.

New Cave Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Crimea (Ukraine)

Type species: Sminthurus caecus Tullberg, 1871

New Cave Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Crimea (Ukraine)

Gisin (1960: 270) regarded Coecarrhopalites Yosii, 1954 as a synonym of Arrhopalites Börner, 1906: “ ungultig weil ohne Typus ” = invalid as without type species. As can be read in Yosii (1967: 66) “ Coecarrhopalites Yosii, 1953 (should be 1954) has been established as a subgenus of Arrhopalites. Later on Delamare et Massoud (1963) have regarded it an independent genus. The genotypical species must be Sminthurus coecus Tullberg, 1871 ”. Apparently this should mean that Yosii admited generic status for Coecarrhopalites and that for two genera –– Arrhopalites and Coecarrhopalites the same type species was chosen. Gough (1973: 208) supported synonymy of Coecarrhopalites: “ In Gisin (1960) Coecarrhopalites is treated as a synonym of Arrhopalites Börner … This is correct because Börner named A. caecus as the type species of Arrhopalites and Yosii, 1954 … chose the same species as the type of Coecarrhopalites. By the rules of nomenclature … Coecarrhopalites immediately becomes a junior synonym of Arrhopalites ”. Ellis and Bellinger (1973: 13) defined name “ Coecarrhopalites Yosii, 1967 ” as a “ junior objective synonym of Arrhopalites Börner, 1906 ” and therefore not an available name. Stebaeva (1988: 188), Christiansen and Bellinger (1998: 1229), and Bretfeld (1999: 62) also regard Coecarrhopalites Yosii, 1967 as synonym of Arrhopalites. From above citations it comes that statements of Gisin (1960) and Gough (1973) are not precisely accurate, as they synonymize subgeneric name Coecarrhopalites Yosii, 1954 of genus Arrhopalites with generic name Arrhopalites. Meanwhile Coecarrhopalites became a generic name only in 1967, thus the correct synonymization should be that of Ellis and Bellinger (1973).

New Cave Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Crimea (Ukraine)

1. Chaetotaxy of great abdomen. Trichobothrial pattern in Symphypleona is a feature of high taxonomic value even on suprageneric level (Richards 1968; Betsch & Waller 1989, 1994; Bretfeld 1999). For the genus Arrhopalites the pattern was defined as triangular or forming an angle ABC opening anteriorly (Richards 1968; Betsch 1980; Betsch & Waller 1989; Christiansen & Bellinger 1998; Bretfeld 1999), although, it was rarely mentioned and drawn in species descriptions. Concerning Arrhopalites Betsch and Waller (1989) in the work devoted to trichobothrial arrangement in Symphypleona describe only Arrhopalites gr. pygmaeus pattern. However, the examination of trichobothrial complex (localization of trichobothria and associated setae) in species of caecus and pygmaeus groups shows that the patterns are different. 1.1. Pattern of caecus type (Figs 4, 36): trichobothria ABC form an angle towards 90 º, trichobothrium B stands remarkably out of line AC. Additional characters: single p seta of p-row of Abd I is located above the level of trichobothrium B (marked with arrow); seta b 1 lies far behind the line BC; seta c 1 lies above and seta c 2 – below trichobothrium C. Two modifications of this pattern were observed: a) trichobothrium A is more distant from B than B from C. Such pattern is presently known for A. caecus (Tullberg, 1871) (see in: Christiansen & Bellinger 1992: Fig. 142 H; Fjellberg 2007: Fig. 111 A; also my observation of Ukrainian material), A. ulehlovae Rusek, 1970 (see in: Rusek 1970: Figs 14, 28), and for A. karabiensis sp. nov. described here (Fig. 4); b) AB and BC are equidistant: shown for A. diversus (Mills, 1934) (see in: Zeppelini 1999: Fig. 1), A. minor Park & Kang, 2007, A. coreanus Park & Kang, 2007 (see in: Park & Kang 2007: Figs 1 b, 3 b) and A. peculiaris sp. nov. described in this paper (Fig. 36). 1.2. Pattern of pygmaeus type (Figs 65, 93, 120, 146): trichobothria ABC form a very obtuse angle, often up to linear mode (trichobothrium B is only slightly out of line AC or in line with AC). AB and BC are equidistant or AB may be somewhat shorter than BC. Additional characters: single p seta of p-row of Abd I is located below the level of trichobothrium B anteriorly to the trichobothrial complex (marked with arrow); seta b 1 lies close to the line between trichobothria B and C; seta c 1 of thichobothrial complex lies on the level or below the level of trichobothrium C. This pattern was observed in species from pygmaeus - group sensu lato (further divisions of species groups followed by Bretfeld 1999: 66):

New Cave Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Crimea (Ukraine)

This definition seems somewhat strain: one can suppose that if inside this group the tendency of secondarily losing of cuticular spines on Abd VI or transforming anterior distal spine on dens into ordinary seta occurs, why both of these characters can not occur together (without cuticular spines on Abd VI and without anterior distal spine on dens but belonging to the caecus - group). In other words, existence of species from the caecus - group but without any distinctive characters defined for this group is supposed to be quite possible. For example, Arrhopalites pukouensis Wu & Christiansen, 1997 satisfies this condition. Accordingly, understanding the caecus - group as a monophyletic composition requires looking for more constant synapomorphies and taking into account a wider complex of characters.

New Cave Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Crimea (Ukraine)

cochlaerifer - group: A. spinosus Rusek, 1967 (specimens from Slovakia and Ukraine), A. gisini Nosek, 1960 (see in: Nosek 1960: Fig. 6). In this group the pattern is the farthest from linear and ABC angle is about 130 – 140 º. postumicus - group: A. nigripes Park & Kang, 2007 (see in: Park & Kang 2007: Fig. 2 b). Pattern is almost linear, AB ≤ BC. 2. Tibiotarsal chaetotaxy of Symphypleona and particularly of Arrhopalites was studied by Nayrolles (1988) (on example of A. terricola) and for this genus had been poorly known before. Since then several authors have described the chaetotaxy of tibiotarsi (Baquero et al. 2005; Christiansen & Bellinger 1996 (only metatibiotarsi); Lin & Chen 1997; Nayrolles 1990 a; Park & Kang 2007 (only metatibiotarsi); Vargovich 1999, 2005; Wu & Christiansen 1997). This literature data together with my own observation allow concluding that: 2.1. Secondary seta FS on fore and mid tibiotarsi is absent in the caecus - group (as in Figs 26, 27, 56, 57). 2.2. Species of the pygmaeus - group bear FS seta on all tibiotarsi (as in Figs 85, 86, 112, 113, 138, 139, 164, 165), however, one exception is known in A. chiangdaoensis Nayrolles, 1990 (see in: Nayrolles 1990 a: Table 1). 3. Anterior dens chaetotaxy has been justifiably used for determination of caecus and pygmaeus - group. 3.1. For the caecus - group it is very typical to have 5 setal rows on anterior dens, often with thickened or heavy spine-like (but in most species with simple) anterodistal seta (Figs 32, 33, 61). However, 4 - rows pattern is also known in species which possess cuticular spines on anal valves and undoubtedly belong to the caecus - group: A. nivalis Yosii, 1966 a, A. baccettii Dallai, 1969. Besides, intraspecific variations (4 or even 6 rows with normally 5 rows) also were observed (see variability in A. karabiensis sp. nov. and A. peculiaris sp. nov.). 3.2. Species of the pygmaeus - group possess 4 setal rows on anterior dens and anterodistal seta never as a spine. However, exception is also known: A. slovacicus Nosek, 1975 placed in pygmaeus - group s. str. (Bretfeld 1999) possibly has 5 rows on anterior dens (see in: Nosek 1975: Fig. 6). Moreover, the cases of variability also occur: the same aberrant specimen of A. kristiani which undoubtedly belongs to the pygmaeus - group, shows 4 setal rows on anterior surface of one dens and 5 rows on another dens (Vargovich 2005). It seems that pygmaeus pattern (4 rows) of anterior dens chaetotaxy is an apomorphy in relation to caecus pattern (5 rows) –– the result of loosing of 1 anterior seta. 4. Cuticular spines. Their presence on small abdomen is remarkable but often variable and not obligate character for caecus - group species (for example, as in A. ulehlovae, A. pukouensis, A. diversus, A. minor, A. coreanus and described here A. peculiaris). None of species from pygmaeus - group has such spines. 5. Globular apex of mucro is the character of most species from the caecus - group, however, similar mucronal apex also was described in A. longicornis Cassagnau & Delamare, 1953 (see in: Cassagnau & Delamare 1953: Fig. 6 G) from the pygmaeus - group. Some other poorly known features may also serve as additional differential traits between considered groups: details of head chaetotaxy (clypeal area seems to be different in caecus- and pygmaeus - group: see descriptions below), etc. In my opinion, despite some exceptions, the set of differences listed above is sufficient for splitting genus Arrhopalites into two separate genera. Actually, it is proposed to reanimate separate generic level for caecus and pygmaeus (s. l.) groups on the base of newly defined and previously known diagnostic characters. However, as it was already mentioned, the name Coecarrhopalites introduced by Yosii as a subgenus and later as a genus (Yosii 1954, 1967) is an objective synonym of Arrhopalites Börner, 1906 because the same type species was designated for both genera. Consequently, it is proposed to save generic name Arrhopalites only for caecus - group with type species Sminthurus caecus Tullberg, 1871 as it was originally designated by Börner, and to assign a new genus under the name Pygmarrhopalites for pygmaeus - group sensu lato with type species Dicyrtoma pygmaea Wankel, 1860.

New Cave Arrhopalitidae (Collembola: Symphypleona) from the Crimea (Ukraine)

Genus Arrhopalites Börner, 1906

Cavernicolous Arrhopalites abchasicus sp. nov. (Collembola: Symphypleona: Arrhopalitidae) from the West Caucasus with a key to the World species of the genusMagnoliaPress via PlaziNo known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.

Export occurrence data

Darwin Core Archive (ZIP)

GEOGRAPHY

Distribution Map

Occurrence Map

Loading map…

Tiles © GBIF Maps API | Map powered by MapLibre GL

REGIONS

Geographic Distribution(49)

Arctic & Sub-arctic

native

Caribbean mainland

native

Central Australia

native

Continental S.E. Asia

native

E. African Steppe

native

Europe

native

Hawaiian

native

Himalayan

native

Macaronesian

native

Malaysian

native

Mediterranean

native

N. & E. Australia

native

N. Eurasia

native

N.E. & Central Brazilian

native

N.North American

native

New Zealand

native

Pacific North American

native

Pampas

native

Polynesia

native

S.North American

native

S.W. Australia

native

Sino-Japanese

native

W. & Central Asia

native

Europe

native

Pacific North American

native

N.North American

native

N.E. & Central Brazilian

native

E. African Steppe

native

Malaysian

native

W. & Central Asia

native

Sino-Japanese

native

Arctic & Sub-arctic

native

N. Eurasia

native

Mediterranean

native

Macaronesian

native

Hawaiian

native

Polynesia

native

N. & E. Australia

native

S.W. Australia

native

Central Australia

native

New Zealand

native

Himalayan

native

Pampas

native

S.North American

native

Caribbean mainland

native

Continental S.E. Asia

native

not evaluated

DATA

Occurrence Datasets

Loading datasets…

Common names used for this species across different languages and regions. Available in 2 languages and 1 country.

BlegkuglespringeredanBlegkuglespringeredan장님알톡토기속kor

Vernacular (common) names are the everyday names used for a species in different languages and regions. A single species may have dozens of common names worldwide. This taxon has names in 2 languages.

Blegkuglespringere

danDK

Source: National Checklist of all species occurring in DenmarkSource taxon #307201526

Blegkuglespringere

dan

Source: Catalogue of LifeSource taxon #296414468

장님알톡토기속

kor

Source: Catalogue of LifeSource taxon #296414468

CLASSIFICATION

Taxonomic Classification Tree

AnimaliaArthropodaCollembolaSymphypleonaArrhopalitidaeArrhopalites

Animalia2,981,931

Arthropoda2,178,073

Collembola17,875

Symphypleona2,617

Arrhopalitidae208

Arrhopalites

NOMENCLATURE

Synonyms(4)

CoecarrhopalitesYosii, 1967

synonym

PseudarrhopalitesStach, 1945

synonym

Smynthurus gracilisK.Absolon, 1901

synonym

Smynthurus niveusJoseph, 1882

synonym

HIERARCHY

Child Taxa(49)

Arrhopalites abchasicusR.S.Vargovitsh, 2013

species

Arrhopalites acanthophthalmusGisin, 1958

species

Arrhopalites alambariensisD.Zeppelini, 2006

species

Arrhopalites amorimiJ.G.Palacios-Vargas & D.Zeppelini, 1996

species

Arrhopalites antonioiGiuga & Jordana, 2013

species

Related Name Usages(20)

Matching names from other GBIF-indexed checklists and datasets.

ArrhopalitesBörner, 1906

acceptedgenus

ArrhopalitesBörner, 1906

MULTIMEDIA

Media Files(7)

FIGURES 2 – 18. Arrhopalites karabiensis sp. nov.: 2, outline of habitus; 3, chaetotaxy of head, frontal view; 4, chaetotaxy of great abdomen, lateral view; 5 – 16, shape of setae: (mpi 1) of Abd VI (5), (mps 2) of Abd VI (6), (ms 1) of Abd VI (7), posterior dorsal seta of great abdomen (8), (dI- 1) of great abdomen (9), anterior dorsal seta of abdomen (10), dorsal seta of mesothorax (11), spine-like (Ia) seta of dens (12), spine-like (Ipe) seta of dens (13), spine-like seta of head vertex (14), appendices anales, lateral view (15) and dorsal view (16); 17, tenaculum; 18, apex of mucro.

FIGURES 34 – 49. Arrhopalites peculiaris sp. nov.: 34, outline of habitus; 35, chaetotaxy of head, frontal view; 36, chaetotaxy of great abdomen of juv. specimen, lateral view; 37 – 47, shape of setae: (ms 1) of Abd VI (37), (mps 2) of Abd VI (38), (dI- 1) of great abdomen (39), posterior dorsal seta of great abdomen (40), anterior dorsal seta of abdomen (41), dorsal seta of mesothorax (42), (Ie) of dens (43), (Ia) of dens (44), spine-like seta of head vertex (45), appendices anales, dorsal view (46) and lateral view (47); 48, tenaculum; 49, apex of mucro.

FIGURES 63 – 76. Pygmarrhopalites tauricus sp. nov.: 63, outline of habitus; 64, chaetotaxy of head, frontal view; 65, chaetotaxy of great abdomen, lateral view; 66 – 75, shape of setae: (ms 1) of Abd VI (66), (mps 3) of Abd VI (67), (Ie) of dens (68), (Ia) of dens (69), seta of head vertex (70), appendices anales, dorsal view (71) and lateral view (72), dorsal seta of mesothorax (73), posterior dorsal seta of great abdomen (74), (dI- 1) of great abdomen (75); 76, tenaculum.

FIGURES 83 – 90. Pygmarrhopalites tauricus sp. nov.: 83, chaetotaxy of furca, posterior view; 84, apex of mucro; 85 – 87, chaetotaxy of tibiotarsus and foot complex: foreleg, posterior view (85), mid leg, posterior view (86), hind leg, anterior view (87); 88 – 90, chaetotaxy of trochanter and femur, anterior view: foreleg (88), mid leg (89), hind leg (90).

FIGURES 111 – 117. Pygmarrhopalites kaprusi sp. nov.: 111 – 112, chaetotaxy of foreleg, anterior view: trochanter and femur (111), tibiotarsus and foot complex (112); 113 – 114, chaetotaxy of mid leg, anterior view: tibiotarsus and foot complex (113), trochanter and femur (114); 115 – 116, chaetotaxy of hind leg, anterior view: tibiotarsus and foot complex (115), trochanter and femur (116); 117, chaetotaxy of furca, posterior view.

FIGURES 137 – 143. Pygmarrhopalites pseudoprincipalis sp. nov.: 137, 140, 142, chaetotaxy of trochanter and femur, anterior view: foreleg (137), mid leg (140), hind leg (142); 138 – 139, 141, chaetotaxy of tibiotarsus and foot complex: fore leg, anterior view (138), mid- (139) and hind leg (141), posterior view; 143, chaetotaxy of furca, posterior view.

IMAGES

Gallery(7)

See Gallery →

Occurrences with images

CITATIONS

References(9)

Bellinger, P. F.; Christiansen, K. A.; Janssens, F. (1996-current)). Checklist of the Collembola of the World (2023 version).

verified source for familyThe Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera

Brands, S. J. (compiler). (1989-2005). Systema Naturae 2000. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2006 version). Originally available online at http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl/; for current information, refer http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/ProjectDescription.aspx .

extant flag sourceThe Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera

basis of recordThe Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera

CoL 2006

current name sourceThe Interim Register of Marine and Nonmarine Genera

Fjellberg (2008) Nordic checklist of Collembola. Excelfil till Per Alström 080303. Inkluderar fynd från Island och Färöarna samt nya fynd från Finland (Huhta/Pietikainen 2007)

Dyntaxa. Svensk taxonomisk databas

Species Profile

Characteristics

Descriptions(16)

Distribution Map

Occurrence Map

Geographic Distribution(49)

Occurrence Datasets

Vernacular Names

Taxonomic Classification Tree

Synonyms(4)

Child Taxa(49)

Related Name Usages(20)

Media Files(7)

Gallery(7)

Occurrences with images

References(9)